On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:

Ralph Goers schrieb:
I will need to add one more feature - I need the exact opposite of SystemConfiguration. I need to be able to read a file and instantiate all the keys and values as system properties. I haven't decided on the best approach to do this so any advice is welcome.

From the API's point of view, would it make sense to add a static method like addProperties(Configuration c) to SystemConfiguration that iterates over the keys of the passed in configuration and adds them as system properties?

I don't know. I really haven't given enough thought on how to do this yet. I just know I have it as a requirement as something we need.



In the meantime though, I'm fine with a 1.6 release.

So the system properties feature needs not to go into 1.6? For me it does not really matter. There is no need to hurry, and I am not sure when I find the time for the release anyway.

If I don't come up with something before you want to do a release just go ahead.



BTW there are some checkstyle warnings in the new classes you committed. Most of them are formatting issues. Do you want to have a look or should I deal with them?


Thanks, I will take care of it.

Ralph

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to