Don't we have a standardized building page? I thought we made that part of the commons m2 "skin"? I seem to remember us discussing this at one point. Perhaps it hasn't been done yet.
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > If you do roll another RC, it would be good to fix a little typo on the > building page: s/io/jxpath in a couple of places. This should be fixed > before deploying the site, in any case. > > Builds, sigs, jar contents, etc. all check out fine. I only tested the Ant > and m2 builds. > > Phil >> >> Thanks to anyone who reported issues with the previous >> two release candidates, and especially to those who >> helped resolve them. >> >> The artifacts are here: >> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/ >> >> The tag is here: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC3/ >> >> Site: >> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/site >> >> Clirr Report (compared to 1.2; one-shot not working w/ >> M2) >> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc3/clirr-report.txt >> >> I'd be grateful if you can make time to check the >> artifacts and cast your vote, which will be open at >> least until Friday, June 20. >> >> Thanks, >> Matt >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
