On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 4:43 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There is a JIRA item for using generics, and another >> for varargs. Additionally it'd probably be nice to >> use generics-level reflection in the oacl.reflect >> package. Thoughts on [lang] 3.0 moving to Java 5 >> source level? > > +1, but I think we need to consider changing the package names (I know > you folks are sick of me saying that) if the API is going to change > that drastically.
I would agree that for Lang that *if* the API change breaks compatibility, then a package name change would be appropriate - but I think its a mistake in general to start making decisions along the lines JDK 1/5/Generics == package rename BEFORE there are any concrete proposals on the table. Niall P.S. Perhaps its a moot point in Lang's case since I guess the deprecated enum package has to be removed to move to a minimum of JDK 1.5. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
