On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +0 > > We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when > making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones > like logging (in this case, to 1.1.1, which contains good number of > fixes over 1.0.4). As indicated by my vote, I don't consider this to > be a blocker.
OK, but its disappointing if thats the only thing that caused you to vote +0 rather than +1. I've updated the logging dependency in trunk so that if I have to cut another RC then it'll be sorted - but I'm still hoping this vote will pass. Niall > Everything else looks good to me (sigs, hashes, manifests -- bar one > minor typo thats already fixed, built using ant, m1, m2 and JDK 1.6). > > -Rahul > > > On 5/20/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to >> release the fix for CHAIN-33[1] - which hit a Struts user recently >> (see STR-3143[2]) - but there are a few other bug fixes as well >> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-33 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3143 >> >> The artifacts are here: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/ >> >> SVN Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/chain/tags/CHAIN_1_2_RC1/ >> >> Site: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/site/ >> (note m2 generates relative links, so some don't work - but the site >> is for info and not included in the release artifacts) >> >> Release Notes: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/site/changes-report.html >> >> RAT Report: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/site/rat-report.html >> >> CLIRR Report: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/site/clirr-report.html >> >> RC2 has been built with m2 - but m1 and ant builds are available - details >> here: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC1/site/building.html >> >> Note: Chain is targetted at JDK 1.3, but I built with JDK 1.5 because >> of the issue with m2 and JDK 1.4 - but I have tested on JDK 1.3 and >> JDK 1.4 using m1 and JDK 1.5 and JDK 1.6 using m2 >> >> Vote is open for 72 hours >> >> Thanks in advance for your feedback/votes. >> >> Niall >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> >> >> [ ] +1 I support this release >> [ ] +0 I am OK with this release >> [ ] -0 OK, but.... >> [ ] -1 I do not support this release >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
