On 15/05/2008, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Steitz a écrit : > > > > Regarding package renaming, there are very few backward incompatible > > changes lined up for 2.0, and all of the proposed 1.5-dependent stuff > > is new, so I am hesistant to do a wholesale change. What would be the > > problem with renaming only packages that contain classes with > > incompatible changes? > > > > On the other hand, a new package may not be needed at all. I checked on > mvnrepository.com the number of open source projects depending on Commons > Math, and besides a beta version of JET from Codehaus, there is none. That > means slight incompatible changes in the 2.0 API are unlikely to cause a > dependency havoc across hundred of projects. >
There must be many projects that use Commons Math that aren't published in the Maven repository. Indeed if not, why was Commons Math created? There must be some projects using it! > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
