--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson a écrit :
> > --- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The javadoc is not linked to the externals
> javadocs
> >> (Java, JDOM,
> >> BeanUtils, JEE)
> >
> > Is that a -1, or just an "ugh"? :)
>
> It's up to you :) I feel it's important to have a
> javadoc that is
> pleasant to read, seeing fully qualified names in
> the method signatures
> and return types is quite annoying.
>
I confess it doesn't really bother me, here nor on the
recently released [lang] 2.4 API docs... ;) But maybe
the concept warrants further discussion for possible
inclusion in the parent POM. It seems to me, though,
that as soon as you build Javadocs against some
location of the core API docs, they're moved anyway.
:P
br,
Matt
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
