Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Oliver Heger a écrit :
I would like to keep main package pretty small, so that it only
contains the basic interfaces and abstract base classes.
Sub packages would group classes with similar functionality. The plist
and web packages are good examples for that, but I am not sure how to
handle specific implementations consisting of only one or two classes
(e.g. INIConfiguration). Putting them in their own package probably
does not make too much sense.
I see a package change that might be worth considering : the 3 XMLReader
classes form a group that could be put in a sub package, o.a.c.c.xml or
o.a.c.c.sax.
What do you think ?
Emmanuel Bourg
Would XMLConfiguration also go into this package?
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]