Matt Benson schrieb: > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on >> it within the >> "dormant" folder or should we move it back into >> sandbox or proper (I >> think it was in proper at one time)? >> > > Was it? I'd thought it hadn't gotten past the > sandbox... Actually, it might be nice to dust it off > and get it up to speed--if not in time for Collections > 4.0, then at _least_ in time for Collections 5.0 > (generics). It sure would be nice to have a release > compatible with 4.0, though. > > Update: yep, this from STATUS.txt in functor: > > "Commons Functor is a currently a "sandboxed" project. > It has > not yet been accepted as an offical part of of the > Apache Commons > project." > > We should be able to hold a quick vote, then > re-sandbox IMO. >
No need to hold a vote IMO. This is just a sandbox project, and you've already got support from James Carman Matt Benson Niall and add me too.. I suggest using lazy-consensus, ie do it and then discuss if someone complains.. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
