On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/ > > > > > > > Sigs etc are fine. > > > > Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1 > > > > > > > It's built from an export of > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2 > > > and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3. > > > > > > Note: The findbugs and cobertura reports are commented out in the > > > pom.xml because they were causing OutOfMemory errors. One of the > > > website files will need updating with the release date. > > > > > > Changes since RC1 are: > > > > > > * Fix to project.xml and pom.xml so the developer lists are the same. > > > * Hardcode the version into the src/assembly/src.xml to get around a > Maven bug. > > > * Fix to the site nav javadoc link to be 2.4 and not 2.3. > > > > > > Should we release it? > > > > It's not easy finding out which versions of Java are supported. > > > > The only reference I could find was in the User Manual: > > > > "Lang seeks to support Java 1.2 onwards ..." > > > > which does not actually promise anything. > > > > Please can the supported Java version(s) be documented more clearly? > > > Will do. Can it be on the website, or does it mean another RC?
Website will do. > I want to update the release_history page to say which version each > supports, which means sitting down and testing each build on a Windows > box so I can get to JDK 1.2 and 1.1(maybe). Then I'll add the 2.4 > specific note to the front page. > Documenting that 2.4 has been tested with 1.3 would be a start ;-) > > > == > > > > The pom.xml <description> refers to: > > > > "Commons.Lang, a package of Java utility classes for the ..." > > > > Surely this should be "Commons Lang..." ? > > > > The description can also be taken to mean that Commons Lang is part of > > java.lang. > > > > The descriptions on the website are better. > > > Will fix. Again - rc blocker? > No > > > == > > > > Minor nit: > > > > project.properties has the line: > > maven.jdiff.old.tag=LANG_2_1 > > > > that should probably be LANG_2_3. > > > Yeah. Though I'm going to suggest deleting the m1 build as soon as the > m2 build has proven itself in a release. > > > > [ ] +1 > > > [ ] -1 > > Any of those blockers? With RM hat on, none of them seem blockers to me. > No. Agreed. > Hen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
