On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:30 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Like everything here it needs volunteers willing to take that role. If > > > > I have spare cycles at the time, I would be willing to do some > > > > releases and I don't mind being asked. > > > > > > > > > > The better the documentation is, the more people will potentially be > > able to help ... > > > > > > > > > > Good, cause I may have to do a 1.1 release of proxy soon! :) The > > > proxy objects generated by proxy aren't serializable in 1.0. It took > > > a bit of work to get them to be serializable. > > > > > > > > > Perhaps add serialVersionUIDs to all the relevant classes? > > Well, I could add that, but I don't think proxies are meant to be > stored for long periods of time (between server restarts for > instance), nor do I think they're going to be sent "across the wire." > They're most likely going to be stored in an HttpSession. So, I don't > know if setting the serialVersionUIDs is that big of a deal. It > couldn't hurt, of course.
I always thought it better to leave them out and let them be generated by the jvm, that way you don't have to remember to update them when changing the class. Niall > > > > > > > > > > > > > Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
