Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons
project sites?
Its fine to use it as part of a components webseit, but Cobertura
includes three javascript files that shouldn't be distributed as part
of a release - so if the site is included in the distro(s) then these
should be excluded (easily done in the assembly descriptor). We asked
this recently on legal-discuss - thread is here:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/luukuehijisvoawo
Thanks for that link Niall.
I'm going to try to create a patch for Cobertura, which will add a
command line switch that excludes the three javascript files and any
references to them in the generated report. Hopefully I can get Joakim
Erdfelt to apply the patch and push out a release. Unfortunately I'm
currently unable to check out the sources from the Sourceforge
subversion repository.
After that the Cobertura Maven Plugin will need to be modified to add a
similar configuration. I'm a committer over at Mojo, where the plugin is
hosted, so this is not a problem.
I'll keep you posted.
Niall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
