2008/2/7, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Observed differences: > > commons-betwixt-0.5: > commons-httpclient-3.1: > commons-jxpath-1.2: > These jars have LICENSE.txt, etc in the META-INF directory. Not that > that is a bad place to be, it just looks like these might have been > prepared manually or by a slightly different script than the other > source jars.
Those one have been manually updated to include the required files that are NOT in the released source distribution. commons-math-1.1: > The diff reports that the LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt, and RELEASE- > NOTES.txt and license-header.txt are different, but it may just be > different line feeds. However, even if it is only line feeds, they > should be consistent. > > commons-pool-1.3: > Possibly line feeds too, but also affects .java files. > > commons-primitives-1.0: > Likely line feeds, just LICENSE.txt > > The script was written to mimic the current candidate builds. > However, it should be straightforward to modify to add missing NOTICE > files and place LICENSE and NOTICE in META-INF if desired. > > The txt files where copied from the source distribution, not from a single reference, so formatting/typo may have been introduced by the original source distribution. Thanks for this nice script ! Should I update the "candidate" folder with the generated jars an call for a vote ? Nico.
