On Jan 9, 2008 11:16 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, not in my opinion. We've agreed to disagree on which way to go with
> this. There are two option, each with its merits and flaws.
>
> A) Use maven-remote-resources-plugin
> B) Keep manually edited files in SVN and copy them manually to the
> correct places
>
> If supporting one of these (A) isn't allowed in the parent pom, then why
> should the other (B) be supported?
Although I agree with your preference for the
maven-remote-resources-plugin, I strongly disagree with the resolution
to not handle these things in the commons-parent pom. If there is no
other way to resolve that, then I'd be in favour for a majority vote.
Your suggestion below is, IMO, a variant of (B). If you're happy with
it, I am well.
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
