The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164 issue presents a multiplication case which is neither consistent with double multiplication nor compliant to C99. Considering the division case which already handles lots of special cases, I think we should really be C99-compliant for this method.
Do we change the behavior of the method and become C99-compliant (thus resolving the issue) or do we change the javadoc only and explain what is done in this case (thus choosing wontfix for the issue) ? Luc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
