On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/8/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip/> > > > > > > I've been adding clirr reports after the fact (running clirr at > > > command line) so folks can glance at changes. I agree it would be good > > > to add a report to the site, I'll need to look at m1 plugin, get it > > > going etc. > > > > > > > OK, understood. > > > > Which reminds me - what about the RAT report? > > > <snap/> > > Ran RAT on the tag, that report has been added (see > commons-scxml-0.7-rat-report.txt) here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/ >
Looks fine. [ RAT should probably be updated to ignore 1-line css files ] > > > > > > > Yup, doap not necessary. PROPOSAL and STATUS are archival things that > > > don't really pertain to any release (actually, STATUS is more cruft > > > than anything else ;-). pom.xml not in since I personally haven't used > > > the m2 build a lot (but I know atleast 'mvn install' works so I guess > > > it could be added). > > > > s/could/should/ - please ;-) > > > <snip/> > > :-) > > I'll cut RC2 mid next week (to allow for any other feedback between > now and then) that has the pom.xml in the source distros. Please feel > free to try out the pom and update it as you see fit within the next > 2-3 days (I haven't tried the m2 site for example, don't intend to > either for v0.7 etc.). > > > > > I looked at the src zip and the 8 jpegs you list seem to be in there. > > > Can you point directly to the file that doesn't have them? > > > > Sorry, I was wrong ... > > > > There was a problem with the extraction process - the files were > > there, but for some reason they were in a different directory - > > SCXML-ST instead of scxml-stopwatch. > > > <snap/> > > Yup, that'd mess with it. > > > > > > > > Me too, that report generation may not be working. Will have to look > > > into it at some point (I think we're fairly complete on Javadocs in > > > general). > > > > OK. > > > > Maybe drop the report if it does not show anything useful (and avoid > > possible future questions about it) > > > <snip/> > > Sounds good (I'll probably take out both reports, Javadoc Report and > Javadoc Warnings Report). > OK, they're probably only really useful together. > -Rahul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
