On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 11:42 -0400, James Carman wrote: > When unit testing classes that are going to be remotified (it's a > word), it's important to test that the parameters and return types can > be serialized/deserialized properly. What if commons-proxy included a > neat little helper class that makes a serialized copy of the > parameters of an invocation before passing them to the target object > and then makes a serialized copy of the return value before returning > it? Does that sound too obscure? I came up with the idea today when > a co-worker was having trouble getting their unit tests to exhibit a > serialization issue.
Sounds like a good idea to me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
