On 8/26/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/24/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Continuum works differently from the old bash script in a couple of
> > ways.  First, it only executes builds when svn changes have happened.
> > So if there are no changes, there will be no "nightly build" for a
> > component.  It also looks for changes and executes builds hourly, so
> > there can be multiple builds in a given day.
>
>
> Given that, isn't Gump producing something closer to what we want for
> nightly builds than Continuum? Why not use the Gump output for the
> nightlies?

On the other hand, why produce a new nightly if nothing's changed?


>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> We need to decide what we jars we publish to the snapshot repo on
> > people.apache.org and what zips/tarballs we make available on the
> > "nightlies" page.  Seems to me we have two choices.
> >
> > 1. Publish only the latest successful build (with build number and
> > date in the metadata but only commons-foo-x.y.z-SNAPSHOT.jar as the
> > jar name) and do the same with the zips/tarballs (only one is
> > available at a given time)
> > 2. Publish jars with uniqueVersion=true, so they are each named
> > differently and keep a fixed number of them around, say 5.  Similarly
> > for the zips/tarballs.
> >
> > I think 1 is simpler and will be easier to maintain (no cron cleanups
> > necessary), but we could get 2. to work if others feel strongly that
> > we should be maintaining a stack of successful builds.  Thoughts?
> >
> > To get the zips/tarballs to work, components need to get m2 assemblies
> > defined for all of the components.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>


-- 
dIon Gillard
Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to