If would to change / add VPN protocol,  I would suggest WiredGuard.
 OpenVPN is great, but key-based installation is much more difficult /
painful  to configure Windows Base Client. / Mobile Client (Android. IOS)
OpenVPN easier deployment is on Access Server , which is paid services (
correct me if I am wrong )





On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:31 PM Stênio Firmino <ste...@usp.br.invalid>
wrote:

> OpenVPN support will be great. S2S
> --
> Stênio Firmino Filho
> Chefe de Seção Técnica - SCINT - CETiSP
> Superintendência de Tecnologia da Informação
> Universidade de São Paulo
> Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, travessa 3, 71
> CEP 05.508-010 - São Paulo/SP
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 8:46 AM Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > as it's, these days, a de facto standard for every VPN device/provider -
> > and there is great support with OpenVPN clients for all client Operating
> > Systems.
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 11:24, Alex Mattioli <alex.matti...@shapeblue.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on OpenVPN, and then a framework later on.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> > > Sent: 10 June 2021 10:25
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Moving to OpenVPN as the remote access VPN provider
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > We've historically supported openswan and nowadays strongswan as the
> VPN
> > > provider in VR for both site-to-site and remote access modes. After
> > > discussing the situation with a few users and colleagues I learnt that
> > > OpenVPN is generally far easier to use, have clients for most OS and
> > > platforms (desktop, laptop, tablet, phones...)  and allows multiple
> > clients
> > > in the same public IP (for example, multiple people in the office
> > sharing a
> > > client-side public IP/nat while trying to connect to a VPC or an
> isolated
> > > network) and for these reasons many users actually deploy pfSense or
> > setup
> > > a OpenVPN server in their isolated network or VPC and use that instead.
> > >
> > > Therefore for the point-to-point VPN use-case of remote access [1] does
> > it
> > > make sense to switch to OpenVPN? Or, are there users using
> > > strongswan/ipsec/l2tpd for remote access VPN?
> > >
> > > A general-purpose VPN-framework/provider where an account or admin (via
> > > offering) can specify which VPN provider they want in the network
> > > (strongswan/ipsec, OpenVPN, Wireguard...). However, it may be more
> > complex
> > > to implement and maintain. Any other thoughts in general about VPN
> > > implementation and support in CloudStack? Thanks.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/networking_and_traffic.html#remote-access-vpn
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>


-- 
Regards,
Hean Seng

Reply via email to