Hi All, (+dev, +pmc)

I agree with what Sunando, Giles, Ivet, Andrija have said. The current CMS is 
not very content friendly, the old Roller based ACS project blog is quite poor 
(https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack<https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/>), I 
spent half an hour just to find how to add an image in the recent blog post! I 
would have preferred that the blog was part of the project website and not a 
separate thing. In addition to the issue with the ACS project blog, the current 
website cms (http://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www) can only be managed by 
people with git skills and not very friendly to use.

It seems Wordpress is pretty much the standard choice used by many blogs, and 
as long as it's secured and had tight access that is governed/managed by PMC 
with ASF/infra I'm +1 on migration to Wordpress. Since this is on 
marketing/users list it may not have reached/read by many PMCs and committers, 
let me cc and ask - @Wei ZHOU<mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com> @Wido 
Hollander<mailto:w...@pcextreme.nl> @Gabriel Beims 
Bräscher<mailto:gabr...@pcextreme.nl> @Sven Vogel<mailto:s.vo...@ewerk.com> 
@Will Stevens<mailto:wstev...@cloudops.com> @Simon 
Weller<mailto:siwelle...@gmail.com> @Pierre-Luc Dion<mailto:pd...@cloud.ca> 
@Daan Hoogland<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> @Boris 
Stoyanov<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> and others PMC members via 
private list, what they think?

Thanks and regards.
________________________________
From: Sunando Bhattacharya <suna...@indiqus.com>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 14:56
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org <market...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Uploading Blog Post

my 2 cents... we really need to have a more "content friendly" platform for 
cloudstack where we can easily populate content that is current and relevant. 
Hosting on WordPress or Webflow really would make life easy for content 
managers. This will also enable us to attract more users to the community and 
grow it.

Best,

Sunando
www.indiqus.com<http://www.indiqus.com>


Book my time for a call 
here<https://t.sidekickopen45.com/s3t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7kv8bWL06W1M6vxk59hl3kW7_k2842Qy2TxW7XLCJP7blRHjN83GqGkDyk8yf8bQQB202?te=W3R5hFj4cm2zwW3F4Fph41QWmBW1JxwY51LDLyRf3zdYTm04&si=5666632314912768&pi=50d864ec-ca69-4d0e-836f-69500e6b5555>



rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 2:22 PM Giles Sirett 
<giles.sir...@shapeblue.com<mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
[discuss]
I would be fully supportive of this - as Andrija says: we should have done this 
years ago.  In fact, we have had this discussion a number of times over the 
years. For example [1]

Every time its raised, most people seem to be +1 on having a site that can be 
easily maintained/ managed  with tools that are familiar with the more 
marketing focussed people in our community (i.e. some sort of CMS) . However, 
every time, the initiative has fizzled out because of the "belief" that top 
level project websites HAVE to be hosted on Apache infra and have to be static 
HTML.  We then get into long discussions about everybody's favourite  types of 
HTML generator tools  - most of which immediately switch off folks like Ivet - 
who (without putting words into their mouths) just want a wordpress/jupal/etc 
site that is easy to manage & update

I spoke to some of the infra guys at Apachecon NA 2019. They seemed informally 
open to the idea of a project hosting their website on something like 
wordpress.com<http://wordpress.com>. They referred me to a legal discussion 
that theyd had [2]. Which, in summary, says  - yes, you can use a 3rd party to 
host a site and it doesn’t have to be static HTML.

 AFAIK, I don’t think that ever became policy, but the key message is, as long 
as certain requirements are met there seems (or rather seemed at the time) to 
be no problem with doing this

So, the question needs to be: as long as the details can be figured, and 
infra/policy allows it, is there any remaining objection to rebuilding our 
website on something like wordpress ?

If there is no strong objection here, I'd be happy to reach out to infra to 
check that their thoughts from 2 years ago remain the same and what is/is not OK

I think that they'd want to see a vote from this community  - but lets see the 
art of the possible first.


Thoughts ?



[1] 
https://markmail.org/search/?q=wordpress&q=list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.cloudstack-marketing#query:wordpress%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.cloudstack-marketing+page:1+mid:gqzrihyek4jjo4df+state:results

[2] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d20daf9889e442bfe44e0908d303c3288e31f437101ca610f1f49eed@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E

Kind regards
Giles

giles.sir...@shapeblue.com<mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




-----Original Message-----
From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com<mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>>
Sent: 25 April 2021 22:04
To: Apache CloudStack Marketing 
<market...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:market...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Uploading Blog Post

+1, but..

If that would be that easily doable, we should surely migrate ages ago - there 
are certain limits from the ASF itself, I don't know all the details
- but it's the same story for the main web site - old, ugly, unfriendly - 
make's you want to avoid it... but, there you go... it's always good to try to 
move forward.


On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 12:12, Ivet Petrova 
<ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

> Perhaps one good idea is migrating the blog to WordPress.
> It is easy to use and operate and supports different levels of access.
> PMC members can be administrators, and there can be just Authors and
> Editors in addition.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 23 Apr 2021, at 12:57, Rohit Yadav 
> <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
>
> FYI - published on behalf of Ivet here:
> https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/meet-the-community-gabriel-b
> rascher as only committers are allowed access to publish on the Apache
> CloudStack blog (something that could be discussed and fixed in
> future).
>
> Regards.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ivet Petrova 
> <ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>>
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 12:09
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org> 
> <us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Cc: market...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:market...@cloudstack.apache.org> 
> <market...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:market...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: Uploading Blog Post
>
> Hello again and Happy Monday Everyone,
>
> Once again - can somebody give me some guidance on this?
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> On 9 Apr 2021, at 12:48, Ivet Petrova 
> <ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com><mailto:
> ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody help me on how a new blog posts can be uploaded on the
> CloudStack blog?
> Is there any backend which is used, or only code?
>
> Thanks a lot on advance!
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com><mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com<mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>>
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
>
>

--

Andrija Panić

Reply via email to