Hi all, I was doing some testing recently and found that the premise used to depreciate 'basic networking' is completely wrong.
Guest networks in basic networking, have ONE SUBNET PER POD, and a gateway per pod for inter-pod guest traffic. Advanced networks with security groups' guest networking has ONE SUBNET per VLAN, which spans the ENTIRE ZONE. They may look very similar when there is only one cluster. BUT THEY ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. I'm all for renaming the network styles (basic and advanced is just meaningless). But an 'advanced network with security groups' with one network is nothing like a basic networking zone. Kind regards Paul Angus
