Totally agree. -Wei On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 10:19, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> > > On 25/02/2021 13:06, Andrija Panic wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > in our official documentation, we state that we support MANY things > that, I > > assume, have not been tested by almost anyone, not being used widely by > > CloudStack users. > > > > My questions: should we make a big note (in the documentation) that "the > > following ... might work, but are not actively tested" or something along > > these lines > > > > Yes, I agree. Many of these things below are uncertain if they actually > work properly. > > > Subjects to discuss bellow: > > ################################### > > > > - > > > > LXC Host Containers on RHEL 7 > > I was already thinking of stripping this out of the code as I don't > think anyone is using it. > > > - > > > > Windows Server 2012 R2 (with Hyper-V Role enabled) > > - > > > > Hyper-V 2012 R2 > > - > > > > Oracle VM 3.0+ > > - > > > > Bare metal hosts are supported, which have no hypervisor. These hosts > > can run the following operating systems: > > - Fedora 17 > > - Ubuntu 12.04 > > > > Supported External Devices > > > > - Netscaler VPX and MPX versions 9.3, 10.1e and 10.5 > > - Netscaler SDX version 9.3, 10.1e and 10.5 > > - SRX (Model srx100b) versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5 > > - F5 11.X > > - Force 10 Switch version S4810 for Baremetal Advanced Networks > > > > ######################################### > > > > My point is that we discontinued supporting i.e. VMware 6.0 (due to > VMware > > stopped supporting it a while ago; valid reason) while in reality it > works > > very well (I know 4.13 works in production environments with VMware 6.0), > > but we keep mentioning we support things that, probably, nobody tested, > nor > > is using at all - the ones from above. > > > > Opinions, suggestion? > > > > Like I said, this list can probably shrink as many things are untested > and haven't been used for a while. > > Wido >
