Well, when I run outside of docker. I see another behavior: Those OOB tests work well, but I meet errors in other pieces of code:
*ivan@notebook:/tmp/MarvinLogs/Nov_07_2018_18_53_35_8SWDQD$ grep -P 'EXCEPTION|FAIL' results.txt * Tests ha enable/disable feature at cluster and zone level ... === TestName: test_ha_configure_enabledisable_across_clusterzones | Status : EXCEPTION === Tests ha resource ownership expiry across multi-mgmt server ... === TestName: test_ha_multiple_mgmt_server_ownership | Status : EXCEPTION === Tests ha FSM transitions for valid healthy host ... === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_available | Status : EXCEPTION === Tests ha FSM transitions leading to degraded state ... === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_degraded | Status : EXCEPTION === Tests ha FSM transitions for failures leading to fenced state ... === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_fenced | Status : EXCEPTION === Tests ha FSM transitions leading to recovering ... === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_recovering | Status : EXCEPTION === === TestName: test_list_zones_metrics | Status : EXCEPTION === Tests out-of-band management ownership expiry across multi-mgmt server ... === TestName: test_oobm_multiple_mgmt_server_ownership | Status : FAILED === FAIL === TestName: test_ha_configure_enabledisable_across_clusterzones | Status : EXCEPTION === === TestName: test_ha_multiple_mgmt_server_ownership | Status : EXCEPTION === === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_available | Status : EXCEPTION === === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_degraded | Status : EXCEPTION === === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_fenced | Status : EXCEPTION === === TestName: test_ha_verify_fsm_recovering | Status : EXCEPTION === FAIL: Tests out-of-band management ownership expiry across multi-mgmt server === TestName: test_oobm_multiple_mgmt_server_ownership | Status : FAILED === FAILED (SKIP=13, errors=6, failures=1) I pasted errors to Pastebin: https://pastebin.com/tXw6mRk7 ср, 7 нояб. 2018 г. в 14:05, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>: > Hi Ivan, > I guess you’re referring to Out of Band management? I think there was a > simulator provider for those tests and they are reported as passing with > latest KVM test run. > > Can you share any logs/exceptions? I don’t see anything wrong with your > setup on a first glance btw. > > Bobby. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 7 Nov 2018, at 20:52, Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, dev team. Now I try to put a PR and need to write marvin test for > > it. I did it in the past, so tried to recall how to run the ecosystem. > > > > I started from the document: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python > > > > To run simulator I have built docker image for 4.11: > > > > docker build -t simulator:4.11 -f tools/docker/Dockerfile . > > > > It has built correctly. > > > > Next, I run the simulator: > > docker run -it --rm -p 8080:8080 -p 8096:8096 simulator:411 > > > > It started well, I can login. > > > > Next, I deployed DC as specified in document above: > > python tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py > > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/deployDataCenter.py > > > > \ > > -i setup/dev/advanced.cfg > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/advanced.cfg> > > > > Next, I run the suite: > > $ export MARVIN_CONFIG=setup/dev/advanced.cfg > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/advanced.cfg> > > $ export TEST_SUITE=test/integration/smoke > > $ export ZONE_NAME=Sandbox-simulator > > $ nosetests-2.7 \ > > --with-marvin \ > > --marvin-config=${MARVIN_CONFIG} \ > > -w ${TEST_SUITE} \ > > --with-xunit \ > > --xunit-file=/tmp/bvt_selfservice_cases.xml > > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/bvt_selfservice_cases.xml > > > > \ > > --zone=${ZONE_NAME} \ > > --hypervisor=simulator \ > > -a tags=advanced,required_hardware=false > > > > What I see is that some tests fail, especially those, which connected > with > > OOB management. > > I tried to do the same for basic zone with basic.cfg and also OOB tests > > fail and some other as well. > > > > Is it OK or I do something wrong? > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > -- > > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > > Bitworks LLC > > Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515 > > Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512 > > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > > -- With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev Bitworks LLC Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515 Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512 WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
