Hi, Dag. Not exactly. Advanced zone uses VR as a GW with SNAT/DNAT which is not quite good for public cloud in my case. Despite that it really solves the problem. But I would like to have it as simple as possible, without VR as a GW and xNAT.
пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 15:21 Dag Sonstebo <dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com>: > Wido / Ivan – I’m probably missing something – but is the feature you are > looking for not the same functionality we currently have in “advanced zones > with security groups”? > > Regards, > Dag Sonstebo > Cloud Architect > ShapeBlue > > On 08/06/2018, 14:14, "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> wrote: > > Hi Wido, I also very interested in similar deployment, especially > combined > with the capability of setting different network bandwidth for > different > networks, like > 10.0.0.0/8 intra dc with 1g bandwidth per vm and white ipv4/ipv6 with > regular bandwidth management. But it seem it takes very big redesign > of VM > settings and VR redesign is also required. > > When I tried to investigate if it possible with ACS basic network, > didn't > succeed with any relevant information. > > > пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 14:56 Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>: > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking into supporting multiple Physical Networks inside onze > > Basic Networking zone. > > > > First: The reason we use Basic Networking is the simplicity and the > fact > > that our (Juniper) routers can do the routing and not the VR. > > > > ALL our VMs have external IPv4/IPv6 addresses and we do not use NAT > > anywhere. > > > > But right now a Hypervisor has a single VLAN/POD going to it > terminated > > on 'cloudbr0' using vlan://untagged. > > > > But to better utilize our physical hardware it would be great it > Basic > > Networking would support multiple physical networks using VLAN > separation. > > > > For example: > > > > - PhysicalNetwork1: VLAN 100 > > - PhysicalNetwork2: VLAN 101 > > - PhysicalNetwork3: VLAN 102 > > > > I've been looking into DirectAttached with Advanced Networking, but I > > couldn't find any reference to it on how that exactly works. > > > > Right now for our use-case Basic Networking with multiple Physical > > Networks would work best for us. > > > > Has anybody looked at this or has any insight of the problems we > might > > run in to? > > > > Wido > > > > > > dag.sonst...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >
