You merged from branch andrijapanic-patch-1, into master. However, this process was done in your own repository and not ACS. You had this PR opened: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/pull/22, and it was merged on Nov 9, 2017.
That is the content you are seeing on link http://docs.cloudstack.apache. org/en/latest/networking/vxlan.html#important-note-on- max-number-of-multicast-groups-and-thus-vxlan-intefaces On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rafael, I just successfully merged (strange?) > https://github.com/andrijapanic/cloudstack-docs/pull/1 and I can see > changes are publicly available on > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ > vxlan.html#important-note-on-max-number-of-multicast- > groups-and-thus-vxlan-intefaces > > Is this normal, that I can merge my own pull request on cloudstack-doc repo > ? There is no limitations (I was able to make PR and merge myself) > > On 21 February 2018 at 00:58, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > pls merge also https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/48 > > > > just correct code block syntax (to display code properly) > > > > On 20 February 2018 at 21:02, Rafael Weingärtner < > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thanks, we will proceed reviweing > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Here it is: > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/47 > >> > > >> > Added KVM online storage migration (atm only CEPH/NFS to SolidFire, > new > >> in > >> > 4.11 release) > >> > Added KVM cache mode setup and limitations. > >> > > >> > > >> > Cheers > >> > > >> > On 20 February 2018 at 16:49, Rafael Weingärtner < > >> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > If you are willing to write it down, please do so, and open a PR. We > >> will > >> > > review and merged it afterwards. > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Andrija Panic < > >> andrija.pa...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I advise (or not...depends on point of view) to stay that way - > >> because > >> > > > when you activate write-back cache - live migrations will stop, > and > >> > this > >> > > > makes *Enable maintenance mode (put host into maintenance)* > >> impossible. > >> > > > > >> > > > I would perhaps suggest that there is documentation for "advanced > >> > users" > >> > > or > >> > > > similar, that will say "it's possible to enable this and this way > >> via > >> > DB > >> > > > hack, but be warned on live migration consequences etc..." since > >> this > >> > > will > >> > > > render more problems if people start using it. > >> > > > > >> > > > If you choose to do, let me know, I can write that (documentation) > >> > > briefly. > >> > > > > >> > > > Not to mention it can be unsafe (power failure - less possible I > >> guess, > >> > > but > >> > > > rare kernel panic etc might have it's consequences I assume) > >> > > > > >> > > > It does indeed increase performance on NFS much, but not > >> necessarily on > >> > > > CEPH (if you are using lirbd cache on client side as explained > >> above) > >> > > > > >> > > > On 20 February 2018 at 15:48, Rafael Weingärtner < > >> > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Yes. Weird enough, the code is using the value in the database > if > >> it > >> > is > >> > > > > provided there, but there is no easy way for users to change > that > >> > > > > configuration in the database. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Andrija Panic < > >> > > andrija.pa...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > So it seems that just passing the cachemode value to API is > not > >> > > there, > >> > > > or > >> > > > > > somehow messedup, but deployVM process does read DB values > from > >> > > > > > disk_offering table for sure, and applies it to XML file for > >> KVM. > >> > > > > > This is above ACS 4.8.x. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 20 February 2018 at 15:44, Andrija Panic < > >> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com > >> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have edited the disk_offering table, in the cache_mode > just > >> > enter > >> > > > > > > "writeback". Stop and start VM, and it will pickup/inherit > the > >> > > > > cache_mode > >> > > > > > > from it's parrent offering > >> > > > > > > This also applies to Compute/Service offering, again inside > >> > > > > disk_offering > >> > > > > > > table - just tested both > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > i.e. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > UPDATE `cloud`.`disk_offering` SET `cache_mode`='writeback' > >> WHERE > >> > > > > > > `id`=102; # Compute Offering (Service offering) > >> > > > > > > UPDATE `cloud`.`disk_offering` SET `cache_mode`='writeback' > >> WHERE > >> > > > > > > `id`=114; #data disk offering > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Before SQL: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > root@ix1-c7-4:~# virsh dumpxml i-2-10-VM | grep cache -A2 > >> > > > > > > <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/> > >> > > > > > > <source file='/mnt/63a3ae7b-9ea9-3884- > >> > > > > a772-1ea939ef6ec3/1b655159- > >> > > > > > > ae10-41cf-8987-f1cfb47fe453'/> > >> > > > > > > <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/> > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/> > >> > > > > > > <source file='/mnt/63a3ae7b-9ea9-3884- > >> > > > > a772-1ea939ef6ec3/09bdadcb- > >> > > > > > > ec6e-4dda-b37b-17b1a749257f'/> > >> > > > > > > <target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/> > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > STOP and START VM = after SQL > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > root@ix1-c7-4:~# virsh dumpxml i-2-10-VM | grep cache -A2 > >> > > > > > > <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='writeback'/> > >> > > > > > > <source file='/mnt/63a3ae7b-9ea9-3884- > >> > > > > a772-1ea939ef6ec3/1b655159- > >> > > > > > > ae10-41cf-8987-f1cfb47fe453'/> > >> > > > > > > <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/> > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='writeback'/> > >> > > > > > > <source file='/mnt/63a3ae7b-9ea9-3884- > >> > > > > a772-1ea939ef6ec3/09bdadcb- > >> > > > > > > ec6e-4dda-b37b-17b1a749257f'/> > >> > > > > > > <target dev='vdb' bus='virtio'/> > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 20 February 2018 at 14:03, Rafael Weingärtner < > >> > > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I have no idea how it can change the performance. If you > >> look at > >> > > the > >> > > > > > >> content of the commit you provided, it is only the commit > >> that > >> > > > enabled > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > > >> use of getCacheMode from disk offerings. However, it is not > >> > > exposing > >> > > > > any > >> > > > > > >> way to users to change that value/configuration in the > >> > database. I > >> > > > > might > >> > > > > > >> have missed it; do you see any API methods that receive the > >> > > > parameter > >> > > > > > >> "cacheMode" and then pass this parameter to a > "diskOffering" > >> > > object, > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > > >> then persist/update this object in the database? > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> May I ask how are you guys changing the cacheMode > >> configuration? > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Paul Angus < > >> > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > I'm working with some guys who are experimenting with the > >> > > setting > >> > > > as > >> > > > > > if > >> > > > > > >> > definitely seems to change the performance of data disks. > >> It > >> > > also > >> > > > > > >> changes > >> > > > > > >> > the XML of the VM which is created. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > p.s. > >> > > > > > >> > I've found this commit; > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/clou > >> dstack/commit/1edaa36cc68e845a > >> > > > > > >> 42339d5f267d49 > >> > > > > > >> > c82343aefb > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > so I've got something to investigate now, but API > >> > documentation > >> > > > must > >> > > > > > >> > definitely be askew. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > >> > www.shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > >> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> > > > > > >> > @shapeblue > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > >> > From: Rafael Weingärtner [mailto:rafaelweingartner@gmai > >> l.com] > >> > > > > > >> > Sent: 20 February 2018 12:31 > >> > > > > > >> > To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > >> > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Caching modes > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > This cache mode parameter does not exist in > >> > > > "CreateDiskOfferingCmd" > >> > > > > > >> > command. I also checked some commits from 2, 3, 4 and 5 > >> years > >> > > ago, > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > > >> > this parameter was never there. If you check the API in > >> [1], > >> > you > >> > > > can > >> > > > > > see > >> > > > > > >> > that it is not an expected parameter. Moreover, I do not > >> see > >> > any > >> > > > use > >> > > > > > of > >> > > > > > >> > "setCacheMode" in the code (in case it is updated by some > >> > other > >> > > > > > method). > >> > > > > > >> > Interestingly enough, the code uses "getCacheMode". > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > In summary, it is not a feature, and it does not work. It > >> > looks > >> > > > like > >> > > > > > >> some > >> > > > > > >> > leftover from dark ages when people could commit anything > >> and > >> > > then > >> > > > > > they > >> > > > > > >> > would just leave a half implementation there in our code > >> base. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > [1] > >> > > > > > >> > https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.11/apis/ > >> > > > > > >> > createDiskOffering.html > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Andrija Panic < > >> > > > > > andrija.pa...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > I can also assume that "cachemode" as API parameter is > >> not > >> > > > > > supported, > >> > > > > > >> > > since when creating data disk offering via GUI also > >> doesn't > >> > > set > >> > > > it > >> > > > > > in > >> > > > > > >> > DB/table. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > CM: create diskoffering name=xxx displaytext=xxx > >> > > > > > storagetype=shared > >> > > > > > >> > > disksize=1024 cachemode=writeback > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > this also does not set cachemode in table... my guess > >> it's > >> > not > >> > > > > > >> > > implemented in API > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Let me know if I can help with any testing here. > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Cheers > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On 20 February 2018 at 13:09, Andrija Panic < > >> > > > > > andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi Paul, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > not helping directly answering your question, but > here > >> are > >> > > > some > >> > > > > > >> > > > observations and "warning" if client's are using > >> > write-back > >> > > > > cache > >> > > > > > on > >> > > > > > >> > > > KVM level > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I have (long time ago) tested performance in 3 > >> > combinations > >> > > > > (this > >> > > > > > >> > > > was not really thorough testing but a brief testing > >> with > >> > FIO > >> > > > and > >> > > > > > >> > > > random IO WRITE) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - just CEPH rbd cache (on KVM side) > >> > > > > > >> > > > i.e. [client] > >> > > > > > >> > > > rbd cache = true > >> > > > > > >> > > > rbd cache writethrough until flush = > >> true > >> > > > > > >> > > > #(this is default 32MB per volume, > >> afaik > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - just KMV write-back cache (had to manually edit > >> > > > disk_offering > >> > > > > > >> > > > table to activate cache mode, since when creating new > >> disk > >> > > > > > offering > >> > > > > > >> > > > via GUI, the disk_offering tables was NOT populated > >> with > >> > > > > > >> > > > "write-back" sertting/value > >> > > > > > >> > > ! ) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - both CEPH and KVM write-back cahce active > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > My observations were like following, but would be > good > >> to > >> > > > > actually > >> > > > > > >> > > confirm > >> > > > > > >> > > > by someone else: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > - same performance with only CEPH caching or with > only > >> KVM > >> > > > > caching > >> > > > > > >> > > > - a bit worse performance with both CEPH and KVM > >> caching > >> > > > active > >> > > > > > >> > > > (nonsense combination, I know...) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Please keep in mind, that some ACS functionality, KVM > >> > > > > > >> > > > live-migrations on shared storage (NFS/CEPH) are NOT > >> > > supported > >> > > > > > when > >> > > > > > >> > > > you use KVM write-back cache, since this is > considered > >> > > > "unsafe" > >> > > > > > >> > migration, more info here: > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://doc.opensuse.org/documentation/leap/ > >> > virtualization/ > >> > > > > > >> > > html/book.virt/ > >> > > > > > >> > > > cha.cachemodes.html#sec.cache.mode.live.migration > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > or in short: > >> > > > > > >> > > > " > >> > > > > > >> > > > The libvirt management layer includes checks for > >> migration > >> > > > > > >> > > > compatibility based on several factors. If the guest > >> > storage > >> > > > is > >> > > > > > >> > > > hosted on a clustered file system, is read-only or is > >> > marked > >> > > > > > >> > > > shareable, then the cache mode is ignored when > >> determining > >> > > if > >> > > > > > >> > > > migration can be allowed. Otherwise libvirt will not > >> allow > >> > > > > > migration > >> > > > > > >> > > > unless the cache mode is set to none. However, this > >> > > > restriction > >> > > > > > can > >> > > > > > >> > > > be overridden with the “unsafe” option to the > migration > >> > > APIs, > >> > > > > > which > >> > > > > > >> > > > is also supported by virsh, as for example in > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > virsh migrate --live --unsafe > >> > > > > > >> > > > " > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Cheers > >> > > > > > >> > > > Andrija > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 20 February 2018 at 11:24, Paul Angus < > >> > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > >> > > > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Hi Wido, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> This is for KVM (with Ceph backend as it happens), > the > >> > API > >> > > > > > >> > > >> documentation is out of sync with UI capabilities, > so > >> I'm > >> > > > > trying > >> > > > > > to > >> > > > > > >> > > >> figure out if we > >> > > > > > >> > > >> *should* be able to set cacheMode for root disks. > It > >> > seems > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > make > >> > > > > > >> > > quite a > >> > > > > > >> > > >> difference to performance. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > >> > > >> www.shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > >> > > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> > > > @shapeblue > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > > >> > > >> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Sent: 20 February 2018 09:03 > >> > > > > > >> > > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Caching modes > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> On 02/20/2018 09:46 AM, Paul Angus wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Hey guys, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Can anyone shed any light on write caching in > >> > CloudStack? > >> > > > > > >> > cacheMode > >> > > > > > >> > > >> is available through the UI for data disks (but not > >> root > >> > > > > disks), > >> > > > > > >> but > >> > > > > > >> > not > >> > > > > > >> > > >> documented as an API option for data or root disks > >> > > (although > >> > > > is > >> > > > > > >> > > documented > >> > > > > > >> > > >> as a response for data disks). > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> What hypervisor? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> In case of KVM it's passed down to XML which then > >> passes > >> > it > >> > > > to > >> > > > > > >> > Qemu/KVM > >> > > > > > >> > > >> which then handles the caching. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> The implementation varies per hypervisor, so that > >> should > >> > be > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > >> > > question. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Wido > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > #huh? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > thanks > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > www.shapeblue.com > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N > 4HSUK > >> > > > > @shapeblue > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Andrija Panić > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Andrija Panić > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > >> > > > > > >> > Rafael Weingärtner > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> -- > >> > > > > > >> Rafael Weingärtner > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Andrija Panić > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Andrija Panić > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Rafael Weingärtner > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > > >> > > > Andrija Panić > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Rafael Weingärtner > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Andrija Panić > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Rafael Weingärtner > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrija Panić > > > > > > -- > > Andrija Panić > -- Rafael Weingärtner