Hi Rohit, I don’t think we need to include any other blocker at this point, smoketests are passing and it’s looking good. I’ll be happy to help you out with upgrade testing from 4.9.2
Thanks, Bobby. boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On Aug 28, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: All, I'll cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 before end of tomorrow, seeking any comments and blockers from the community. Thank you. - Rohit ________________________________ From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 9:49:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS) All, Over the past couple of weeks, we've reviewed, tested and merge several PRs. In the recent Trillian test run against latest 4.9 branch, against KVM, VMware and XenServer all smoke tests passed except for rVR and rVPC related failures which are same as the failures in 4.9.2.0. The most common failure in the rVR setup is that the MASTER VR does not work properly, however a workaround is to reboot it, which causes BACKUP VR to takeover as MASTER and routes, private gateways and other issues resolve themselves. During this effort, we've also tried to stabilize master branch and currently, most smoke tests are passing on master for KVM, XenServer, VMware except for rVR, rVPC tests, and some intermittent failures seen for some volume, vpn, snapshot related tests. With this, we'll be running component tests and hopefully cut 4.9.3.0 RC1 for voting soon. 4.9 smoketest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2217 Master smoketests PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2225 - Rohit ________________________________ From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:34:29 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS) Hi Alireza, One of the issues mentioned may have been already fixed in 4.9 branch and will make its way in 4.9.3.0. For the other issue, a fix/PR does not exist already. Given, it's not a blocker/critical issue and freeze is tomorrow, if we don't have a PR soon it will likely get fixed in future releases. Thanks. - Rohit ________________________________ From: Alireza Eskandari <astro.alir...@gmail.com<mailto:astro.alir...@gmail.com>> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 12:53:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS) Hi Rohit Please consider these bugs in next release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10033 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9994 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/><http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
