https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062 should be ready to merge, I think I had that one ready a couple weeks ago.
*Will Stevens* CTO <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > The only PR that is currently showing in blocker status is : > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062 > > Are there others that should be tagged? > > > - Si > > > ________________________________ > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:43 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features > > Rajani, > > > Can we have a list of outstanding blockers/issues? > > > I also saw some enhancement PRs merged, which I think we should be > avoiding and instead have our resources spent on fixing the release > blockers, thanks. > > > Regards. > > ________________________________ > From: Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> > Sent: 08 May 2017 16:20:01 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features > > I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont > have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the > blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding > features on already broken/blocked master which is not > releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be > the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster > releases/release cycles. > > Thanks, > > ~ Rajani > > http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ > > On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland > (daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com) wrote: > > LS, > > In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are > waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs > certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those > bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will > fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that > development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes > too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always > decide to re-branch before releasing. > > Thoughts..? > Daan > > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > >
