> Op 27 maart 2017 om 14:09 schreef Will Stevens <sw...@apache.org>: > > > Hey All, > If anyone is using S3 as Secondary Storage in production (or even testing > at this point), please respond to this thread. >
We are. Using Ceph's RADOS Gateway (Hammer, 0.94.11) as the gateway with CloudStack 4.5 (Yes... ;( ). > We have been using Swift in production for the last couple years and I > think we have worked out most of the kinks. Not all of our fixes have been > pushed upstream yet because the Swift and S3 integrations are very > intertwined and we did not want to break the S3 implementation with our > Swift fixes. > > We would like to get a sense of the stability of the S3 implementation to > see if it is also a good option as an object based secondary storage. > It is, but our experiences are mainly with 4.5. It still uses a ancient version of the AWS S3 SDK and that causes most of our troubles. In general we however see the ACS copies a lot of Objects to the S3 store and downloads them again afterwards. Not always the best thing. I wouldn't use Amazon S3 directly as that might cause a lot of data transfer. Should be running 4.9 within 4 weeks, can report on it a lot better then. Wido > Thanks, > > *Will Stevens*
