Volks,

It has been almost a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these
tickets.

In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
by the time. However, we have some (a lot?) Jira tickets that seem to be
left behind. I think a cleanup from time to time is a good thing.


In 48 ours I will close all of the tickets mentioned here. If I close
something that should not have been closed, please pardon me ;).



After this, I will proceed with a new batch of tickets. Hopefully, in some
iterations of this process, we can get rid of these forgotten tickets.

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks ;)
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Rafael. I uploaded an ISO and walked through the necessary parts
>> of the wizard. I agree with you that it has been fixed. I commented on the
>> ticket, then resolved and closed it just now.
>>
>> On 2/23/17, 12:46 PM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks for taking time to look at this Mike.
>>     The ticket (CLOUDSTACK-4164
>>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164>) I managed to
>>     check, and I believe it can be closed.
>>
>>     On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>     > Thanks for compiling this list, Rafael!
>>     >
>>     > I see I was the reporter for this issue:
>>     >
>>     > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>>     >
>>     > I plan to take a look at it and see what the current state is.
>>     >
>>     > On 2/23/17, 10:26 AM, "Rafael Weingärtner" <
>> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com>
>>     > wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     Hi folks,
>>     >     I have been reviewing old Jira tickets and we have a bunch that
>> can be
>>     >     closed. The following are the ones I have gone through. Before
>> I close
>>     > any
>>     >     ticket I would like to check them with you, especially the ones
>> from a
>>     >     category called “Seems to be fixed has to be checked”. I will be
>>     > waiting
>>     >     for your feedback before I proceed to close any ticket.
>>     >
>>     >     - Have a title that does say much and the ticket does not have a
>>     > detailed
>>     >     description
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2225
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-917
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-947
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1259
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1441
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1576
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2705
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5793
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >     - Already solved
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2532
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6735
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6837
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7161
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8202
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8781
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8817
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9065
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1069
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1460
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1702
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1870
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2075
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2213
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2439
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6009
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5219
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4847
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4778
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4238
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4071
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4055
>>     >
>>     >     - Seems to be fixed has to be checked (I did not have how to
>> check
>>     > these
>>     >     right now)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8873
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8918
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-963
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1025
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1177
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1225
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1283
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1284
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1285
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1287
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1442
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1478
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1659
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2215
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2436
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5225
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4883
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4440 (I
>> think
>>     > Nicolás
>>     >     may be able to help checking this one)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3784
>>     >
>>     >     - May be able to close after brief discussion/conversation
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7819 (are
>> we
>>     > supposed
>>     >     to be able to add tags to projects? Is it working right now?)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1497 (Do
>> we want
>>     > to
>>     >     preserve alien VMs?)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1570 (I
>> did not
>>     >     understand if this is a feature that we already have and was
>> only
>>     > lacking
>>     >     documentation, or if it is a feature suggestion)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2535
>> (There is a
>>     >     discussion one person said some old configuration should be
>> removed and
>>     >     other said that they should now. However, the discussion stopped
>>     > there; I
>>     >     think we can close this)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2616
>> (Database
>>     >     connection validation, do we have a config in our connection
>> pool to
>>     > keep
>>     >     those connections alive even when idle? Or at least recreate
>> them when
>>     > they
>>     >     expire?)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5550 (Is
>> this a
>>     >     problem? the keys are pretty big; I do not see the need to fully
>>     > display
>>     >     the keys. A simple "shift + end" can be used to select the keys
>> and
>>     > copy
>>     >     them. Maybe a copy to transfer area button would be better?)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5182 (The
>> pages
>>     > do not
>>     >     seem to exist anymore in new documentation page)
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4018 (User
>>     > entering
>>     >     invalid information regarding the environment, I do not see
>> this as a
>>     > bug
>>     >     (it is a user`s problem))
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2785 (it
>> does not
>>     > seem
>>     >     to be a bug)
>>     >
>>     >     - Feature request that I did not understand the use and no one
>> seemed
>>     > to
>>     >     have worked on it
>>     >     -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8368
>>     >
>>     >     Thanks in advance for you future time and help ;)
>>     >
>>     >     --
>>     >     Rafael Weingärtner
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Rafael Weingärtner
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>



-- 
Rafael Weingärtner

Reply via email to