John and Team

Thanks for amazing work and contributing back.

Regards,
ilya

On 10/3/16 9:48 PM, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
> 
> A quick update on our progress to pass all smoke tests aka super green.  We 
> have reduced the failures and errors for XenServer from 93 to 9 and for 
> VMware from 51 to 14.  A CentOS 6/CentOS 6 KVM run is currently executing.  
> Based on manual tests/fixes, we are expecting to be the first super green 
> configuration.  We have also found the following additional defects:
> 
>   * CLOUDSTACK-9528 [2]: SSVM Downloads (built-in) Template Multiple Times 
>   * CLOUDSTACK-9529 [3]: Marvin Tests Do Not Clean Up Properly
> 
> 9528 is causing XenServer environments to fail to install and startup 
> cleanly.  A lack of cleanup described in 9529 is causing XenServer to exhaust 
> available resources before a test run completes.  We believe that resolution 
> of these issues will address most, if not all, of the XenServer issues.
> 
> Thanks,
> -John
> 
> [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65873020
> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9528
> [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9529
> 
>>
> john.burw...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 2:40 AM, John Burwell <john.burw...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Using blueorganutan, Rohit, Murali, Boris, Paul, Abhi, and I are executing 
>> the smoke tests for the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches against the following 
>> environments:
>>
>>      * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + VMware 5.5u3 + NFS Primary/Secondary 
>> Storage
>>      * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + XenServer 6.5SP1 + NFS 
>> Primary/Secondary Storage
>>      * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + CentOS 7.2 KVM + NFS Primary/Secondary 
>> Storage
>>
>> Thus far, we have found seven (7) test case and/or CloudStack defects in the 
>> VMware run for the 4.8 branch [1].  We are currently triaging fifty-one (51) 
>> new issues from the XenServer run to determine which issues were 
>> environmental and defects.  This triage work should be completed today (30 
>> Sept 2016).  Finally, we are awaiting the results of the KVM run.  
>>
>> We are using PR #1692 [2] as the master tracking PR to fix all defects in 
>> the 4.8 branch.  Our goal is to get all non-skip tests to pass and then 
>> merge this PR to the 4.8, 4.9, and master.  For each bug, we are creating a 
>> JIRA ticket and adding a commit to the PR.  Currently, the branch for this 
>> PR is in the shapeblue repo (the branch started with a much smaller fix from 
>> Paul and we just kept using it).  However, if others are interested in 
>> picking up defects, we will move it to ASF repo.  Once the 4.8 branch is 
>> stabilized, we plan to re-execute these tests on the 4.9 and master branches 
>> as we expect that the 4.9 and master branches will have additional issues.
>>
>> Since we are in a test freeze, I propose that no further PRs are merged to 
>> the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches until they are stabilized.  The following 
>> PRs will be re-based, re-tested, and merged to 4.8, 4.9.1.0, and/or 4.10.0.0 
>> post-stabilization:
>>
>>      * 1696
>>      * 1694
>>      * 1684
>>      * 1681
>>      * 1680
>>      * 1678
>>      * 1677
>>      * 1676
>>      * 1674
>>      * 1673
>>      * 1642
>>      * 1624
>>      * 1615
>>      * 1600
>>      * 1545
>>      * 1542
>>
>> I recognize that this a large backlog of contributions ready to merge, and 
>> apologize for asking folks to wait.  However, given current state of the 
>> release branches, merging them before we complete fixing the smoke tests 
>> would create a moving target that further delay stabilization.  
>>
>> Obviously, it is unlikely we will make the 10 October 2016 release date for 
>> the 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0 releases.  At this point, it is difficult 
>> to estimate the size of the schedule slip because we still have issues to 
>> triage and test runs to complete.  I have created a wiki page [2] to track 
>> progress on this effort.  
>>
>> Does this approach sound reasonable?  Any suggestions to speed up this 
>> process will be greatly appreciated as stabilizing and re-opening these 
>> branches stable ASAP is critical for the community.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -John
>>
>> [1]: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9518?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(4.8.2.0)%20AND%20labels%20in%20(4.8.2.0-smoke-test-failure)
>> [2]: 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65873020
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I think it is important that you or Rajani sign off on anything that
>>> gets in while branches are frozen so you guys can stay on top of what goes
>>> in.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the hard work team.  :)
>>>
>>> *Will STEVENS*
>>> Lead Developer
>>>
>>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:10 AM, John Burwell <john.burw...@shapeblue.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Per our release schedule [1], the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches are frozen
>>>> for testing.  There are some straggling PRs that Rajani and I are working
>>>> to merge.  Is it acceptable to everyone that for the next two (2) weeks,
>>>> all PRs require not only 2 LGTMs, but approval by Rajani or I to be merged
>>>> to these branches?  To be clear, we don’t have to perform the merges,
>>>> simply give a thumbs up.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -John
>>>> john.burw...@shapeblue.com
>>>> www.shapeblue.com
>>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
>>>> @shapeblue
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> john.burw...@shapeblue.com 
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
>> @shapeblue
>>
>>
>>
> 

Reply via email to