Yep, in the process of getting the release cut. Got side tracked by people a few times, but I am almost finished... I will keep you posted...
*Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thank you Will. Please cut the 4.9 branch so it can be picked for LTS > release work. > > I'll publish the rpm/deb packages in the sb hosted upstream repo shortly. > > Regards. > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:27 PM +0530, "Will Stevens" < > wstev...@cloudops.com<mailto:wstev...@cloudops.com>> wrote: > > Sorry, I did not follow the correct format. :P > > After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.9.0 *passes* with 6 PMC + 2 > non-PMC votes. > > +1 (PMC / binding) > * Rohit Yadav > * Mike Tutkowski > * Wido den Hollander > * Milamber > * Nux! > * John Burwell > > +1 (non binding) > * Paul Angus > * Abhinandan Prateek > > 0 > none > > -1 > none > > Thanks to everyone participating. > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > The vote is closed. The RC passed with the following votes. > > > > +1 : 8 (including 6 binding) > > +0 : 0 > > -1 : 0 > > > > Thanks everyone, I will get this pushed out today... > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > Lead Developer > > > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Abhinandan Prateek < > > abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Did manual testing with a cluster of Xen 6.5 in advanced zone. > >> Vm life cycle > >> VM Snapshot, volume snapshots > >> Volume and Template from snapshots > >> Migration > >> Change Password > >> Change service offering > >> VPC, multiple tiers, VMs, ACLs > >> > >> Regards, > >> -abhi > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 29/07/16, 1:43 AM, "John Burwell" <john.burw...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > >> > >> >All, > >> > > >> >I vote +1 (binding). We have tested 4.9.0 RC2 in the following > >> environments: > >> > > >> > • CentOS 6.8 management server + CentOS 6.8 KVM Hosts using NFS > >> primary and secondary storage (would allow us to verify/fix the > documented > >> libvirt/qemu versions) > >> > • CentOS 6.8 management server + vCenter 5.5u3d + ESXi 5.5u3b > >> using NFS primary and secondary storage > >> > • CentOS 6.8 management server + vCenter 6.0u2 + ESXi Express > >> Patch 6 using NFS primary and secondary storage > >> > • CentOS 6.8 management server + XenServer 6.2 SP1 using NFS > >> primary and secondary storage > >> > • CentOS 6.8 management server + XenServer 6.5 SP1 using NFS > >> primary and secondary storage > >> > > >> >For each environment, we have run the following tests: > >> > > >> > • All smoke tests > >> > • test_accounts.py > >> > • test_acl_*.py > >> > • test_sharednetwork*.py > >> > • test_add_remove_network.py > >> > • test_advancedsg_networks.py > >> > • test_affinity_groups*.py > >> > • test_cpu_domain_limits.py > >> > • test_cpu_limits.py > >> > • test_cpu_max_limits.py > >> > • test_host_maintenance.py > >> > • test_memory_limits.py > >> > • test_network_offering.py > >> > • test_overcommit.py > >> > • test_persistent_networks.py > >> > • test_ps_domain_limits.py > >> > • test_ps_limits.py > >> > • test_ps_max_limits.py > >> > • test_ps_resize_volume.py > >> > • test_ps_resource_limits_volume.py > >> > • test_resource_limits.py > >> > • test_routers.py > >> > • test_security_groups.py > >> > • test_shared_networks.py > >> > • test_snapshots.py > >> > • test_ss_domain_limits.py > >> > • test_ss_limits.py > >> > • test_ss_max_limits.py > >> > • test_templates.py > >> > • test_update_vm.py > >> > • test_volumes.py > >> > • test_vpc.py > >> > > >> >During our tests, we found the following issues, but do not see any of > >> them as blockers: > >> > > >> > • As Paul and Boris noted, the > >> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL in > >> test_vpc_redundant.py fails. We are uncertain as to whether this > failure > >> is caused by a defect, a problem with the test case, or our test > >> environment. > >> > • We have seen NPEs in the log every 10 minutes attempting to > >> garbage collect a non-existent XenServer volume previously attached to a > >> VR. While ugly, it is not leaving unused volumes to consume disk space. > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> >-John > >> > > >> >> > >> >john.burw...@shapeblue.com > >> >www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> >53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK > >> >@shapeblue > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I'm getting a pass on KVM for > >> /marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py > >> >> And a FAIL on VMware for the same test, with the same error. > >> >> > >> >> 2016-07-28 04:00:52,133 - CRITICAL - FAILED: > >> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL: ['Traceback (most > >> recent call last):\n', ' File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", > >> line 369, in run\n testMethod()\n', ' File > >> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 537, in > >> test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL\n > >> self.check_routers_state(1)\n', ' File > >> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 304, in > >> check_routers_state\n self.query_routers(count, showall)\n', ' File > >> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 297, in > >> query_routers\n "Check that %s routers were indeed created" % > count)\n', > >> ' File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 553, in > >> assertEqual\n assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)\n', ' File > >> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 546, in _baseAssertEqual\n > >> raise self.failureException(msg)\n', 'AssertionError: Check that 1 > routers > >> were indeed created\n'] > >> >> > >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> > >> >> Paul Angus > >> >> > >> >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> >> @shapeblue > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On > >> Behalf Of Will Stevens > >> >> Sent: 28 July 2016 17:24 > >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2 > >> >> > >> >> The teardown issue looks to be environmental. Apparently the network > >> did not get cleaned up before the network service offering using it was > >> attempted to be deleted. > >> >> > >> >> I am not sure about the test_vpc_redundent test failure. I run that > >> test all the time on KVM and have not been getting that problem. Do you > >> get the same thing if you run it again in your environment? > >> >> > >> >> *Will STEVENS* > >> >> Lead Developer > >> >> > >> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > >> >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* > tw > >> @CloudOps_ > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Boris Stoyanov < > >> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi we’ve run: test_vpc_redundant and got : > >> >>> > >> >>> 2016-07-28 16:36:29,959 - CRITICAL - FAILED: > test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers: > >> >>> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File > >> >>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run\n > >> >>> testMethod()\n', ' File > >> >>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 620, in > >> >>> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers\n self.check_routers_state()\n', ' File > >> >>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 353, in > >> >>> check_routers_state\n self.fail("Expected \'%s\' routers at state > >> >>> \'%s\', but found \'%s\'!" % (expected_count, status_to_check, > >> >>> cnts[vals.index(status_to_check)]))\n', ' File > >> >>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 450, in fail\n > raise > >> >>> self.failureException(msg)\n', "AssertionError: Expected '1' routers > >> >>> at state 'MASTER', but found '0'!\n"] > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Deleting network offering while in use? > >> >>> > >> >>> 2016-07-28 16:38:41,560 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: > >> test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers: > >> >>> ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File > >> >>> "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 398, in run\n > >> >>> self.tearDown()\n', ' File > >> >>> "/marvin/test/integration/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py", line 281, in > >> >>> tearDown\n raise Exception("Warning: Exception during cleanup : > >> %s" % > >> >>> e)\n', "Exception: Warning: Exception during cleanup : Execute cmd: > >> >>> deletenetworkoffering failed, due to: errorCode: 431, > errorText:Can't > >> >>> delete network offering 35 as its used by 1 networks. To make the > >> >>> network offering unavaiable, disable it\n"] > >> >>> > >> >>> Our setup is centos68 with xen6.2 hosts. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > >> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Jul 27, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Haijiao <18602198...@163.com<mailto: > >> >>> 18602198...@163.com>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi, Gents > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Anyone tested RC2 with redudant VR configuration ? I think there > are > >> some > >> >>> issues not fixed yet, e.g. password server. > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9385 > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> We will test these days and come back. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > > >> > >> abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >
