Cool, thanks for clarifying. Too bad Strongswan didn't make it.
I'll test shortly.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Will Stevens" <wstev...@cloudops.com>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 11 July, 2016 16:07:02
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1

> Yes, we did not change the systemvm templates because features like
> strongswan, etc, did not make it into this release...
> 
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
> 
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> I take it we're still to use the old 4.6 systemvm template?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Will Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com>
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 July, 2016 21:52:14
>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>> >
>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546
>> > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb
>> >
>> > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release
>> > tomorrow.  If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after.
>> >
>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> > location):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> indicate
>> > "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Will

Reply via email to