Hi Simon,
Do you have the exact stept to reproduce?
To me it sounds like the issue is in either the ovsVifDriver or the VXLAN
stuff. Can you reproduce the scenario in the bubble (with its default
vlan/bridgeVifDriver)?
If there is a clear scenario, I think we should write an integration test (even
if that shows it’s broken).
Regards, Remi
On 17/06/16 22:47, "Simon Weller" <swel...@ena.com> wrote:
>Here's a quick run down on the configuration(s) we're testing:
>
>
>Centos 7.2
>
>Advanced Zone with VXLAN on KVM
>
>VPC functionality including Private GW, VPN, Static Routes, ACL Lists et al
>
>Redundant VPC VRs
>
>Ceph Primary Storage
>
>NFS and S3 secondary storage
>
>As Will mentioned, we've found an odd issue with VPCs that we're still
>debugging.
>
>Here's a summary of what we've found thus far:
>When a tier is added, the network interface for the tier network is never
>plugged by libvirt. You only get 2 interfaces (eth0 and eth1). eth2 is never
>plugged when you attempt to provision the first VM within the VPC and the VM
>creation fails. If you have existing VMs and you restart the router, you lose
>the eth2 interface in the libvirt configuration (confirmed with a virsh
>dumpxml).
>If you leave the VRs alone after the upgrade, VMs can be provisioned correctly
>(until you reboot the VRs).
>
>I did also run into the NIO SSL agent not connecting problem again. When I
>telnetted to 8250, the agent immediately came up without me having to restart
>it. So keep an eye out for that as well.
>
>
>- Si
>
>________________________________
>From: williamstev...@gmail.com <williamstev...@gmail.com> on behalf of Will
>Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:02 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: 4.9/master Testing Coordination
>
>Syed is looking into a potential issue with Swift as secondary storage on
>master.
>
>ENA is looking into a potential problem when upgrading a VR which was
>working in 4.8.0, but after an upgrade to 4.9.0 and restarting the network
>there are only 2 nics instead of 3. If they spin a new VR from scratch it
>seems to work. I need to follow up with them to see if they have an
>updated status of their testing.
>
>*Will STEVENS*
>Lead Developer
>
>*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>
>On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote:
>
>> The following tests are running cleanly on KVM with Advanced networking
>> and 2 hosts.
>>
>> echo "Running tests with required_hardware=true"
>> nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
>> tags=advanced,required_hardware=true \
>> smoke/test_password_server.py \
>> smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py \
>> smoke/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py \
>> smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py \
>> smoke/test_vpc_router_nics.py \
>> smoke/test_router_dhcphosts.py \
>> smoke/test_loadbalance.py \
>> smoke/test_internal_lb.py \
>> smoke/test_ssvm.py \
>> smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py \
>> smoke/test_privategw_acl.py \
>> smoke/test_network.py
>>
>> echo "Running tests with required_hardware=false"
>> nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
>> tags=advanced,required_hardware=false \
>> smoke/test_routers.py \
>> smoke/test_network_acl.py \
>> smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py \
>> smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py \
>> smoke/test_service_offerings.py \
>> smoke/test_network.py \
>> component/test_vpc_offerings.py \
>> component/test_vpc_routers.py
>>
>> I need to do some more manual testing...
>>
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>>
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <
>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My testing has been performed using XenServer 6.5 and ESXi 5.5.
>>>
>>> I executed all of the tests in test/integration/plugins/solidfire.
>>>
>>> They all came back successful.
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: John Burwell <john.burw...@shapeblue.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 12:56 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: 4.9/master Testing Coordination
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> It is a bit lo-fi, but if you are testing master in preparation for the
>>> 4.9 RC, could you please share information about the configurations you
>>> testing (e.g. hypervisors, storage backends, network configurations, etc)?
>>> Any test results could also be helpful. The hope is to reduce duplication
>>> of effort and understand how much of the system has been covered.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -John
>>> john.burw...@shapeblue.com
>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
>ShapeBlue - The CloudStack Company<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
>www.shapeblue.com
>Overview Apache CloudStack contains an authentication module providing "single
>sign-on" functionality via the SAML data format. Under certain conditions, a
>
>
>
>>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
>>> @shapeblue
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
