I hav no access to the nodes so I wouldn't know about that.

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Parallel builds will use different workspace, so that should not be a
> problem.
>
> Maybe the “@” symbol it uses to differentiate the workspace folders?
> I mean, when it runs parallel builds, it will use a “@” and then it will
> append a number to identify the builds.
>
> For instance, if we have workspace called “Test”, when running parallel
> builds we would get something like: “Test@2” , “Test@3”  and so forth.
> That
> “@” symbol in a folder may break some scripts.
>
> Also, if the scripts that are executed were not prepared to run in
> parallel, they might use the very same temp folder and files, which can
> cause problems.
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It also does a mvn clean so that should not be an issue. I am thinking
> more
> > along the line of parallel builds on the same node.
> >
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is Jenkins configure to clean the workspace before it starts a new
> build?
> > >
> > > It should have an option such as "Delete workspace before build
> starts".
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Will Stevens <
> williamstev...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If Jenkins has problems with fragments being left over in it's
> > workspace
> > > > which is causing following runs against other PRs to fail, how do we
> > fix
> > > > that?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks...
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rafael Weingärtner
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Weingärtner
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to