Hi Will Thanks for the detailed update and effort.
Please keep us posted. Regards ilya On 4/18/16 1:48 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > ACS PRs > > - 1452 - master (ready, pending LGTM) > - 1475 - 4.7 (pending clarification) > - 1420 - master + svm (CI running) > - 1365 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1402 - 4.7 (needs work) > - 1454 - master (ready, pending LGTM) > - 1459 - master (rerun CI) NOTE: This closes #561 > - 1409 - master (pending CI) > - 1433 - master (pending CI) > - 1230 - master (pending CI) > - 1326 - master (*pending CI) > - 1436 - master (*pending CI) > - 1455 - master (*pending CI) > - 1423 - master + svm (*pending CI) > - 1428 - master (pending ALL) > - 1450 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1453 - master (pending ALL) > - 1403 - master (pending ALL) > - 1331 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1475 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1458 - master (pending ALL) > - 1297 - master (pending CI) > - 1410 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1483 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1470 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1471 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1472 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1473 - 4.7 (pending LGTM) > - 1474 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1486 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1483 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1488 - master (pending ALL) > - 872 - master + svm (pending CI) > - 1489 - master (pending CI) > - 1456 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1412 - 4.6 (pending ALL) > - 1406 - 4.6 (pending LGTM) > - 1378 - 4.6 (pending LGTM) > - 1491 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1360 - master (pending LGTM) > - 1490 - 4.7 (pending ALL) > - 1493 - master (pending ALL) > - 1397 - master (pending CI) > - 1499 - master (pending ALL) > - 1371 - master + svm (pending ALL) > - 1500 - master (pending ALL) > > * Denotes special requirements for CI testing > svm = specifies that the PR will require an updated systemvm template > > --- > > Here is this Monday's status report. It is looking like we will need a new > systemvm template with the 4.9 release, so I would like to try to get on > top of the PRs that will require systemvm template changes so we can make > sure to get them tested and in earlier in this release window. This will > give us more time to work out any kinks prior to the RC. > > Sorry for the slow down on the CI. I have been having some hardware > issues, but I think I have resolved my issues (fingers crossed). We now > have Daan up and running with a CI environment as well, so that will help > as well. I owe a couple people instructions for getting a CI environment > setup so they can start testing. I will hopefully be able to get to that > tomorrow. > > If you can review the list above and try to give me code reviews on > anything that has a status of 'pending LGTM' since I am only missing code > review for those PRs (assuming my status is up to date). Also, I need to > start getting code reviews on the PRs that have a status of 'pending ALL'. > > There are a few PRs that have come up that are targeting 4.6. I would like > some guidance for how I should be handling them. My understanding is that > the 4.7 release is the oldest supported release, so should I be asking the > author to close the PR and open a PR against the 4.7 code? > > Hope you all had a great weekend. Looking forward to a productive week > this week. :) > > Cheers, > > Will >
