Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#discussion_r59146919 --- Diff: setup/db/db/schema-481to490.sql --- @@ -413,3 +413,89 @@ VIEW `user_vm_view` AS -- Add cluster.storage.operations.exclude property INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration` (`category`, `instance`, `component`, `name`, `description`, `default_value`, `updated`, `scope`, `is_dynamic`) VALUES ('Advanced', 'DEFAULT', 'CapacityManager', 'cluster.storage.operations.exclude', 'Exclude cluster from storage operations', 'false', now(), 'Cluster', '1'); + +-- Added in CLOUDSTACK-9340: General DB optimization, 4 cases: + +----- 1) Incorrect PRIMARY key +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`ovs_tunnel_network` +DROP PRIMARY KEY, +ADD PRIMARY KEY (`id`), +DROP INDEX `id` , +ADD UNIQUE INDEX `i_to_from_network_id` (`to` ASC, `from` ASC, `network_id` ASC); + +----- 2) Duplicate PRIMARY KEY +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`user_vm` DROP INDEX `id_2` ,DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`domain_router` DROP INDEX `id_2` ,DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vm_instance` DROP INDEX `id_2` ,DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`account_vlan_map` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`account_vnet_map` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`baremetal_rct` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`cluster` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`conditions` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`counter` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`data_center` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`dc_storage_network_ip_range` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`dedicated_resources` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`host_pod_ref` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`iam_group` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`iam_policy` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`iam_policy_permission` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`image_store_details` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`instance_group` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`netapp_lun` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`netapp_pool` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`netapp_volume` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`network_acl_item_cidrs` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`network_offerings` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`nic_secondary_ips` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`nics` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_ha_work` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_host` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_host_transfer` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_networks` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_nwgrp_work` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_vm_ruleset_log` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`op_vpc_distributed_router_sequence_no` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`pod_vlan_map` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`portable_ip_address` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`portable_ip_range` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`region` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`remote_access_vpn` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`snapshot_details` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`snapshots` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`storage_pool` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`storage_pool_details` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`storage_pool_work` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`user_ip_address` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`user_ipv6_address` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`user_statistics` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`version` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vlan` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vm_disk_statistics` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vm_snapshot_details` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vm_work_job` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vpc_gateways` DROP INDEX `id` ; +ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`vpn_users` DROP INDEX `id` ; + +----- 3) Missing indexes (Add indexes to avoid full table scans) --- End diff -- did you execute some evaluation to see which fields were being most used to create an index for them? For instance, why did you create an index for the field called "type" of table "op_it_work"
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---