Sure it makes.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > Yes, if the PR is ONLY a test and does not touch any other code then we can > only run that test. I agree with you. > > If any code is changed outside the test, I always run the full suite. Make > sense? > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > running a new test in an environment should pass but should not require > all > > other test being re-validated. SO what is the point of running all > others? > > I am not saying we shouldn't regularly run all tests but in this case it > > adds no value AFAICT. > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, I want to run tests against the tests. I have found issues in > some > > of > > > the tests not working as expected, so I add the test to the run and run > > > them. I think it is worth it because then we know the test is valid > > > later. I would rather have the author fix the test now if there are > > > problems than having to work through it later. > > > > > > I am going to be doing a big push on getting testing cleaned up, so > when > > I > > > start going through all the tests and validating them, I want to reduce > > the > > > amount of work I have to do, so validating the tests at source makes > > sense. > > > :) > > > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > > Lead Developer > > > > > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > > > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > 1326 is just a test. it does not touch production code. Do we run > > > > regression tests against such PRs. seems a waste to me. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Daan Hoogland < > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Daan Hoogland < > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> 1326 - master (*pending CI) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > starting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
