Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1134#issuecomment-160532869
Yes, I understand and it makes sense to have that documented. It doesn't
have to mean we phase out QueryService. This makes sense to be there for people
with read-only access and it can be used by other services. It also makes sense
to consider if Example is a final type of resource or a generic (or
implementation of a generic type of resource). A service would be for the whole
family, would it?
btw @pdube none of my remarks should be interpreted as a -1 to your PR! I
like big very much this ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
