Round 2 RPMs from http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm-packages-with-branch-parameter/22/
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 11 November, 2015 12:13:59 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2) > Lucian, are you testing RC2 or 1? > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> -1 >> >> I'm testing upgrade from 4.4.1 (what we run in production) to 4.6.0 and >> have hit 2 issues. >> >> 1 - minor packaging issue, upgrading to 4.6.0 makes >> cloudstack-awsapi-4.4.1 complain about missing deps; rpm -e --nodeps >> cloudstack-awsapi gets rid of the problem, perhaps there's a better way to >> obsolete this package >> >> 2 - after upgrading the packages to 4.6.0, the mgmt server complains the >> 4.5 systemvm is missing - wtf? >> opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9056 for this >> with more info >> >> Lucian >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Remi Bergsma" <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Sent: Tuesday, 10 November, 2015 15:03:03 >> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 (round 2) >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up >> for a >> > vote: >> > >> > Git Branch and Commit SH: >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151110T1545 >> > >> > Commit: e31ade03c66368c64f0cd66cb7b0b754cddfb79d >> > >> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> > location): >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/ >> > >> > PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F): >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> > >> > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate >> > "(binding)" with their vote? >> > >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > > > -- > Daan
