Hi Daan, I am not aware of the work done for rVPC networks. I am still in the POC stage, will update the FS or scope it down depending on the changes related to rvpc, If there are too many changes may be i will restrict this to non vpc networks.
I will create a apache ticket fro this work. Thanks, Bharat. On 11-Aug-2015, at 9:16 pm, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you make a ticket on apache instead of referring an internal ticket? > > Can you describe how this work relates to the rvpc refactor work done for > 4.6? > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently we use redundant virtual router enabled networks to prevent >> network outage even if one of the virtual router fails. This is achieved by >> using redundant virtual routers along with VRRP protocol. This has >> increased the network robustness. However updating a network with new >> network offering involves some downtime due to Vr restarts. In case of >> redundant VR based networks we can sequence the network update operations >> to update the backup first and then update the master while master's >> operations are being handled by backup, this way i think we can minimise >> the downtime. >> >> link to FS. >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61310469 >> >> Please review the FS and give suggestion or comments. >> >> Thanks, >> Bharat. >> >> > > > -- > Daan
