I will, Sebastien. I know that some of this is gems. A lot of it has been merged or really abandoned and superseded by other code. I know you and Pierre-Luc are working on docker so I would definitely inquire with you guys about this branch.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’d just be a bit careful here. > > There might be some tale branches that still have useful info. > like the ‘docker’ branch. it might just be 100 LOC that are interesting > but yet, that’s where they are. > > > On Aug 3, 2015, at 6:06 PM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On 02 Aug 2015, at 15:46, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> As we are changing our review process I want to clean up the > >> repository at apache getting rid of stale branches. Of course the > >> release branches of old releases should stay, but a lot of old > >> branches have been merged at unknown places in the master or old > >> release branches. I want to propose to delete them as much as > >> possible. > >> > >> - I want to delete any branch that has no commits newer then one year > old > >> - I want to ask the last commiter on any branch with commits newer > >> then one year to review if 'their' branch can be removed > >> - All branches that are merged back are to remain untouched. > >> > >> ideally only the branches 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and master will > >> remain as branches HEAD. This is unfortunately not true for some older > >> releases that were never merged back into their respective release > >> branches. Any work in progress will of course not be touched. > >> > >> comments? > >> -- > >> Daan > > > > -- Daan
