Daan,

Having worked in an environment where PRs are required for all merges, tooling 
is only way to ensure it is followed without creating a tremendous human 
burden.  The tooling is not difficult to implement (and there are a number of 
options beside the one I suggested), and reduces (or eliminates) the need for 
people to go through the history to find improper commits.

Thanks,
-John

---
John Burwell (@john_burwell)
VP of Software Engineering, ShapeBlue
(571) 403-2411 | +44 20 3603 0542
http://www.shapeblue.com



> On Jul 1, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:44 PM, John Burwell <john.burw...@shapeblue.com> 
> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I think we should stick to 2 votes per PR.  Defining types of PRs becomes 
>> difficult bordering on the arbitrary — adding a process complexity and the 
>> potential to start debating if a particular PR is one type or another.
>
> agree
>
>>
>> I agree regarding the fast forward, and feel that all PRs should squashed 
>> down to one commit.  Ultimately, intermediate commits that seem informative 
>> in a feature branch become noise in a history as large as CloudStack’s.
>
> bad practice in my not so humble opinion.
>
>>
>> To enforce the policy and ensure that PRs are merged in an orderly and 
>> correct manner (i.e. one at time), I think we should consider adopting a 
>> tool such as bors [1] to verify that the merge passes all tests and then 
>> performs the merge. It would some minor modification to require two votes, 
>> but I doubt that would take much effort to implement.  If there is interest, 
>> I would happy to make those changes for the project.
>
> Tooling is great but let us first find a practice to agree on and then
> fit tooling on it.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -John
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/graydon/bors
>>
>> ---
>> John Burwell (@john_burwell)
>> VP of Software Engineering, ShapeBlue
>> (571) 403-2411 | +44 20 3603 0542
>> http://www.shapeblue.com
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 1:48 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> On 25-Jun-2015, at 4:38 pm, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A few of us are in Amsterdam at DevOps days. We are chatting about release 
>>>> management procedure.
>>>> Remi is working on a set of principles that he will put on the wiki to 
>>>> start a [DISCUSS].
>>>>
>>>> However to get started on the right track. I would like to propose the 
>>>> following easy step:
>>>>
>>>> Starting Monday June 29th (next monday):
>>>>
>>>> - Only commit through PR will land on master (after a minimum of 2 LGTM 
>>>> and green Travis results)
>>>> - Direct commit will be reverted
>>>> - Any committer can merge the PR.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I’ve been trying to help close PRs, it was difficult at first but then I 
>>> found some tooling to help me do that. I think it’s certainly do-able 
>>> without investing a lot of effort to do it, perhaps can done everyday or 
>>> every few days in a week.
>>>
>>> Some suggestions and comments to improve PR reviewing/merging:
>>>
>>> - Let's merge the PR commits in a fast forward way instead of doing a 
>>> branch merge that introduces frivolous merge commits. This is one approach 
>>> to do quickly and painlessly:
>>>
>>> http://blog.remibergsma.com/2015/05/24/accepting-pull-requests-the-easy-way/
>>>
>>> - Let’s try to send PR around on one issue or one broad issue, or against a 
>>> JIRA ticket; but avoid unrelated sub-systems etc
>>>
>>> - If there are not many changes (say less than 100-200 lines were changed), 
>>> let's have the changes melded into one commit. This can be done either by 
>>> the PR author or by the committer. The immediate benefit is that all the 
>>> changes will be much easy to port across other branches, easy to view and 
>>> follow git-log, and easy to revert-able.
>>>
>>> - Certain PRs that are typographical fixes, doc fixes and tooling related 
>>> fixes - so let’s review and merge them if we’ve at least one green review 
>>> (“LGTM”), though changes to CloudStack mgmt server, agent and plugins 
>>> codebase IMO should have at least 2 green reviews (“LGTM”).
>>>
>>>> Goal being to start having a new practice -everything through PR for 
>>>> everyone- which is an easy way to gate our own commits building up to a PR.
>>>>
>>>> There is no tooling involved, just human agreement.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design & 
>>> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>>> CloudStack Software 
>>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>>> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is 
>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>> CloudStack Software 
>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure 
>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil 
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a 
>> company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under 
>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Reply via email to