Wido, do we have support for RBD resize currently in 4.5 branch ? I tested
4.5.1 tag, and it didnt work - Im talking here about DATA volume resize,
while VM is off...
2015-05-28 16:14:56,257 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Seq 1-4646870390516222369:  { Ans: , MgmtId:
90520740254323, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.
storage.ResizeVolumeAnswer":{"newSize":0,"result":false,"details":"Failed
to resize volume: Cannot determine resize type from pool type RBD","wait":0}}]
}

Sorry for offtopic...


On 29 May 2015 at 15:45, Remi Bergsma <r...@remi.nl> wrote:

> That's OK Daan. Let's get some final patches in (if any) before we'll
> create a RC for 4.5.2 somewhere next week. In the mean time we'll work to
> get 4.4.4 out.
>
> Regards,
> Remi
>
> 2015-05-29 15:00 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Remi, let's doe 4.4.4 this weekend first;) if no further issues come
> up....
> > Or do we want a 4.5.2 irrespective and simultaneous?
> >
> > Op vr 29 mei 2015 om 14:25 schreef Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/29/2015 02:20 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I've been playing with KVM on CentOS 7.1 and found it does not work
> > > > well with 4.5.1 due to a problem that Rohit already solved last
> > > > week (thanks!). See PR:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/290
> > > >
> > > > Shall we do a new 4.5 release in the coming week or so? Then we can
> > > > benefit from some of the fixes that have been done.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Seems sane to me. Looking at the commits I see a lot of small fixes
> > > from which users could really benefit.
> > >
> > > Wido
> > >
> > > > Regards, Remi
> > > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1
> > >
> > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVaFq7AAoJEAGbWC3bPspCVvAP/15xtyhXnhW8WeoLwUp3yurP
> > > DwCchTw9WSQLO/NPK+ggdniuiP2vAeQQCSV8GUvzziO309elRDvaYR5tgrksRLzk
> > > 1Q4F4tKNxr1PE/pAYJ4eogLbBa1RXJLN+h7ILYxghRNaZWFozG+VlXDF4Twob2e6
> > > VVyq6azBd7i9NQD9k1Z9WbTvxW32dKlGEU/L0R2I7sVdkvtc7bkMDVDLKJsLdTqs
> > > bk+GswnUTjUQWLHVEH2/Hnla34x+0Vw/OOooMzbc6NkX0nLYnKvE85xrqJaZpIim
> > > g639ahe/jntJsvayKwpJXduYRe4xmXd+W/tSJ09PP7ImhGSxgInwmp2cPdjWxA9l
> > > 0pmYlaAQ/+dRmiTER8aRsSmrYI334CCfkgzEe3WN+eMPH0WSE6iLVIWPasZQ/syH
> > > RzekbUhFKRD8jb4e5n5ni6b7DRw+iIMlj1VqcPRo9cACYtrR4rdisgGQB/VYCLJx
> > > HJJW/sodbcf+7lwYYVyZvG1p8XzLuMhJNaoA7y5Ll19xro9k5rSdPLnSP3meeUR1
> > > 6KhzRoWaoCNlCpzsYHKVQxCLeDjyvsa/ge2rSKR+Aj+aPkXCiylLxfAeKiJIQuPz
> > > nc3WDKuwwbbpGSf7KkBat8QgNv0od1SOEkfPVtCXuGHkZ9F5JP/i/LqgX5Ms1viu
> > > I6HqlDzIGvrGAmQy/byA
> > > =tmHL
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Reply via email to