-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 04/09/2015 12:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi Daan,
> 
> If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the
> kvmheartbeat script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it
> work reliably. We’ve tested it in our employee cloud and it works
> fine.
> 

+1

Is it in the 4.4 branch already?

> Regards, Remi
> 
> 
> On 09 Apr 2015, at 11:27, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
>> Daan,
>> 
>> "33744ed658bbf29924bf79c0a651f88abcf793f9: appliance: build
>> systemvm template for KVM compatible with older qemu" this seems
>> important as System VMs will not be able to run on older qemu
>> (namely CentOS 6).
>> 
>> Since we've been taking our time with it, I wouldn't mind another
>> quick RC, at least release something good.
>> 
>> -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> 
>> Nux! www.nux.ro
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> To: "dev"
>>> <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015
>>> 09:33:07 Subject: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc
>> 
>>> H,
>>> 
>>> I made a 4.4.3 rc a couple of weeks ago and it has tachnically
>>> enough votes to be released atm. There where some fixes in the
>>> last two weeks that are not in there however and it is no
>>> trouble to create a new rc. Should I/Can I? Or do we all feel
>>> the present state should be released:
>>> 
>>> 33744ed658bbf29924bf79c0a651f88abcf793f9: appliance: build
>>> systemvm template for KVM compatible with older qemu 
>>> 244c361b50c7de8b7b4299e8aabcad01efc12e35: appliance: remove any
>>> stale raw.img file 9a730d469c7d0baa51034761934791536260396e:
>>> CLOUDSTACK-6353: Fix list to have correct LB IP for each rule 
>>> a79fd8816e1fb91f2df78332380f23ea47463481: Add CONTRIBUTING
>>> instructions
>>> 
>>> These don't seem like heavy weighing issues but I still want to
>>> give opportunity to champion for any of them.
>>> 
>>> -- Daan
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=qcKu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to