Erik - Both were wrote to support 4.x. As far as I'm aware there is suppose to be no breaking API changes between .x versions. (its been awhile so excuse my lack of examples) but in some cases we noticed small formatting or rendering differences in older 4.x versions, we attempted to accommodate these as much as possible. I'm not aware of any clever way to do this other than fix them as we see them..... very much so open to suggestions.
While writing it we tested against exoscale which was 4.0.2 at the time. We also tested against the 4.2 simulator and based the test cases of 4.2 simulator replies. Feel free to check out https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack/tree/master/tests/data to see what exactly we test. I hope this answers your concerns. On 5 April 2015 at 21:35, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ian Duffy <i...@ianduffy.ie> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> As stated in a previous thread [1], myself, Sebastien and Darren are >> proposing the donation of gstack [2]. >> >> I would like to call a vote, so that we have formal consensus on >> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted >> into a separate repository like we do with cloudmonkey. >> >> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. >> >> > +1 > > How does gstack (and ec2stack) handle CloudStack versioning? Do they self > discover API calls, or are they related to specific CloudStack versions? > > -- > Erik
