Nice question - I would like this fixed if possible...?
On 10 March 2015 at 14:47, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I've ran into the issue where it seems that local storage can't be
> overprovisioned.
>
> storage.overprovisioning.factor is set to 1.5 in both the global and
> zone settings, but this is ignored.
>
> In this case it's a 1TB SSD which currently has 68GB allocated on
> disk, but 750GB of disk space has been allocated according to CloudStack.
>
> Looking StorageManagerImpl there is this if-statement:
>
> if (storagePool.getPoolType() == StoragePoolType.NetworkFilesystem ||
> storagePool.getPoolType() == StoragePoolType.VMFS) {
> DO OVERPROVISION
> } else {
> DO NOT OVERPROVISION
> }
>
> So why is local storage excluded here? Since QCOW2 is sparsely
> allocated and templates deployments are just clones of a parent QCOW2
> it's fair to say that with local storage you can also overprovision?
>
> Any objections to adding this?
>
> Wido
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU/vXdAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCSIEP/RW5Yzx5tap2YQxDMKjF5b/r
> TewVIheKexlvOsr6BzVY4M++55YutZjXBGzRouy//d2T5ozqJg7EyrXZtzU3wbXM
> T/nyMjyuvziGjB/poTHVDE+yEDQ79UbU2BXKdp5CYBZJHDSw1ilZajUqo26KhqKb
> N2xatwcCAo2p0dMMze3QwYxkd3gtMwkREok3lvN153SIhi2pKQSoRMU0eA68q0wZ
> 30jprOBnjqzGcRkbkvM6/KN84OB3720BNVuc3JbJPdItG7UchbzIW8bJvHfhMViD
> MXZObpD0aWSLbZZYSfgNH+bL1P2XXldOWeQ+HI5q+A7Sf8q0i9PlEpAR+gqROHGA
> UtGk8MCi0OP7zjXciDOHrhGYfxQ+o0iIF0knt6fCXpma+KzRDxQo6Eo7D2rHGv2e
> 8xarZ4oamhAmytUxiL2i74cNS6d248P4fER0CUQ4tML/4jdXMRvALud2XYwK+e+C
> HRnZ0/X2YPzQbhJeZne8cYkf3vz3emLbck0dcgvAQtDIlPekeNAhs6Ik5hxCP29G
> Nsp8LILw69VPcSkDAHmLV6Gzd1jaIxtObM67CQLA0F3q/ehFwD29mncxe7kh1AhP
> yuW8s+oUjyQxhaV/glMTj2odbV4MfLA8Hzw3/wGtj6vHYcMAvCrRGGUo7gO5RPgv
> l1tt1vl1aPA0OR7BZEXF
> =I9Y1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Andrija Panić
