Wido, those were my thoughts as well. I haven't looked at the code
yet, but I'd be surprised if they had to change storage code (or even
hypervisor-specific code outside of passing along new VR script
Commands) in any way to accommodate a VR feature, so I hope this is
just caution. But enough guessing, perhaps I should just go look.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 02/17/2015 02:19 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>> People,
>>
>> We are having some internal discussions about this code at
>> Schuberg Philis. We are (most specifically I am) convinced that we
>> cannot foresee the ways in which this can break master when merged.
>> We had only one issue coming back from the community and this was
>> functional more then an issue. By the number of issues that we find
>> our selves this can't be right. We had no -1 either so the only
>> logical conclusion is that no one else is testing this part of the
>> code.
>>
>> We do not test all the code and our quality improvement process is
>> not up to spec [1] yet. Things are going to stop working in the
>> master branch when we merge this. I don't like this but I see no
>> way to prevent this in our present state of affairs. We are adding
>> as much tests as we can without hurting Schuberg Philis business
>> and that has a limitation.
>>
>> You can read how Wilder's env is set up and Ian's isn't very
>> different. So let me use a negative formulation this time: If we
>> merge now the following things will not have been tested: most
>> hypervisors: kvm vmware hyperv
>
> I don't *think* it's a major problem since you changed the VR itself,
> but the way it is deployed is still the same. In the end it's just a
> disk for the hypervisor.
>
>> storage: all non nfs things
>
> I'm not so afraid for this since the storage is handled by the
> hypervisor and the VR doesn't have any knowledge there.
>
>> ipv6 functionality This is not a complete list, I suspect.
>>
>> Can I get a lot of +1 in spite of these uncertainties? Can you all
>> please test as much as possible?
>>
>
> As we discussed on the phone, my test cluster is broken at the moment
> and it will take me 2~3 weeks to get it up and running again.
>
> Wido
>
>> I called a merge for this morning but will give it a few more
>> rebase efforts because of those considerations.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Quality+and+Process+Improvement+Initiative
>>
>>  On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
>> <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have been some tests on the branch in order to give you all
>>> some confidence.
>>>
>>> During the tests I found 1 bug related to communication from VM A
>>> on Tier 1 to VM B on Tier 2 in a Single VPC. I can reproduce the
>>> bug and it disappears when I convert the Single VPC to a
>>> redundant one. I already talked to Ian and he is on it.
>>>
>>> Results follow below.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Wilder
>>>
>>> Environment:
>>>
>>> Xen 6.2 running on VMware zone within our Betacloud (ACS 4.4.2)
>>> MySQL running on MacBook Pro Management Server on MacBook Pro
>>>
>>> ::: Manual Tests:::
>>>
>>> Isolated Networks
>>>
>>> * Create Network * Create 2 VMs using new Network * Create FW
>>> rules * Create PF rules * SSH to the VMs * SSH from one VM onto
>>> the other in the same isolated network * Destroy Master router *
>>> Restart the Network * Restart the Network with Clean-up option *
>>> Repeat steps above
>>>
>>> Redundant Isolated Networks
>>>
>>> * Create Redundant Network Offering * Create 2 VMs using new
>>> offering * Create FW rules * Create PF rules * SSH to the VMs *
>>> SSH from one VM onto the other in the same redundant isolated
>>> network * Destroy Master router * Restart the Network * Stop the
>>> Master Router
>>>
>>> Single VPC
>>>
>>> * Create VPC * Create 2 Tiers * Create ACLS * Create 1 Vm for
>>> each Tier * Associate 2 IP address * Add PF rules * SSH onto VMs
>>> * SSH from 1 VM onto another * Restart VPC - Make it redundant *
>>> Repeat steps above
>>>
>>> Redundant VPC
>>>
>>> * Create VPC * Create 2 Tiers * Create ACLS * Create 1 Vm for
>>> each Tier * Associate 2 IP address * Add PF rules * SSH onto VMs
>>> * SSH from 1 VM onto another * Stop/Destroy the Master Router *
>>> Observe the Backup router became Master * SSH again onto the VMs
>>> * Restart VPC (without clean-up) * Observer only 1 new router is
>>> created * New router is started as Backup * SSH onto VMs *
>>> Restart VPC (with clean-up) * Observer only 2 new routers are
>>> created * SSH onto VMs
>>>
>>> ::: Automated Tests :::
>>>
>>> Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
>>> test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain
>>> allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is created ... ===
>>> TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>> Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
>>> test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain
>>> with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... ===
>>> TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test
>>> update domain admin details ... === TestName:
>>> test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user
>>> update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status :
>>> SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName:
>>> test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API
>>> does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
>>> test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 9 tests in 1140.977s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
>>> test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 1 test in 216.907s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
>>> test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy
>>> Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status :
>>> SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... ===
>>> TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test
>>> Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status :
>>> SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>> test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual
>>> Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS
>>> === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
>>> test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual
>>> Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS
>>> === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be
>>> present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual
>>> Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS
>>> === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 10 tests in 851.022s
>>>
>>> OK (SKIP=1)
>>>
>>> Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration
>>> has no host credentials to check router services Test restart
>>> network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === TestName:
>>> test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router
>>> advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status
>>> : SUCCESS === ok Test stop router ... === TestName:
>>> test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test start router
>>> ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>> Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 7 tests in 454.519s
>>>
>>> OK (SKIP=1)
>>>
>>> Test to create service offering ... === TestName:
>>> test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to
>>> update existing service offering ... === TestName:
>>> test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to
>>> delete service offering ... === TestName:
>>> test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 3 tests in 206.916s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName:
>>> test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 2 tests in 373.908s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> Test create VPC offering ... === TestName:
>>> test_01_create_vpc_offering | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC
>>> offering without load balancing service ... === TestName:
>>> test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC
>>> offering without static NAT service ... === TestName:
>>> test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test
>>> VPC offering without port forwarding service ... === TestName:
>>> test_05_vpc_off_without_pf | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test VPC
>>> offering with invalid services ... === TestName:
>>> test_06_vpc_off_invalid_services | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test
>>> update VPC offering ... === TestName: test_07_update_vpc_off |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test list VPC offering ... === TestName:
>>> test_08_list_vpc_off | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>> test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering
>>> (integration.acs.tests.test_vpc_offerings.TestVPCOffering) ...
>>> === TestName: test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering | Status :
>>> SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 8 tests in 672.382s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> test_privategw_acl
>>> (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ...
>>> === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 1 test in 90.756s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> Test to change service offering of router after addition of one
>>> guest network ... === TestName:
>>> test_04_chg_srv_off_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy of router after addition of
>>> one guest network ... === TestName:
>>> test_05_destroy_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to stop and start router after
>>> creation of VPC ... === TestName:
>>> test_01_stop_start_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS
>>> === ok Test to reboot the router after creating a VPC ... ===
>>> TestName: test_02_reboot_router_after_creating_vpc | Status :
>>> SUCCESS === ok Tests to change service offering of the Router
>>> after ... === TestName: test_04_change_service_offerring_vpc |
>>> Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to destroy the router after creating
>>> a VPC ... === TestName: test_05_destroy_router_after_creating_vpc
>>> | Status : SUCCESS === ok
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> Ran 6 tests in 665.965s
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>> On 16 Feb 2015, at 17:53, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> H,
>>>>
>>>> I will merge our feature/systemvm-persistent-config into
>>>> master. If you have objections please let me know before
>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> @john: your comment was addressed in the present day version.
>>>>
>>>> -- Daan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU40zmAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCVHgP/ReiqputXvndXpIy1q9dFBqF
> wXXtFlqLKAwm7XmtmOrqUdOWPB7fCGPo6G6Tka/divg0BHLxU/Mzfx9vQRXXzGwK
> 4WROFyOTl0pTLbksJhbTR0pzT4FEfK6EkfIz2S+zd1xaFGlc/puWSjGHs45RS5vm
> SqNM5knZVo+4nTTMepJFQFEBN4GND8wbTuI3EEjcaodQ1uZM6+3COPaNjj74cXtr
> K+k7MxSJq0tBBKlCO30Ou0oK/pPn4Az9zYkNgfBoyoJfe8W2PCHS0/f3La3O19Cr
> lIOjvVoA1zNfC+E8WRhhZC/HNOzme0MiAAPHHkPykWL9xVBObSihkhiu9XehYjKK
> aK614+Hte6bLD+gra9H01QA1z8Y8ylFxFRTXb+e6fcV6mVReICaQ5tkL50fuTuJ2
> HRk+1Ybul35/J3ZW3qQ7rikpF4sQ9XTC6MrCpl3Ix0XopYxWtvkLTHVtH5iLWhzy
> hwiS2kAcc9F8zsLIl01tTbUMxAJUR6cms2AxInPadYUlNu3FmCUwTaFpV8GIr1VK
> kdcsEyQdXwXTPCcelCraJ214GVpH3IESqtkeqNDB1F7fPNhJQMyQgVT6fzCVXe4G
> I9Fo82+2X8x7XEwGZL81nt3D0p+ndG0zd+awWlrR4C7rQ3UJl+SSBIkKtqT8G8XS
> AA3KCgF8a43lyTNCk1x/
> =19tY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to