Hi Daan, Yes we generally submit our patches upstream when we are sure that the change will not break other environments that we cannot / have time to test. We run basic zone and KVM with local storage, so it’s not the most common Cloudstack setup.
Our latest patches for 4.4 will be submitted within a few days. Regards, Loic > On 15 Feb 2015, at 12:46, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Antoine, Loic, > > would be good to share fixes. We had some problems with 4.4 ourselves > so probably there is some doubles here. If you could, please do a > merge and a pull request against apache/4.4...? > > thanks > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Antoine Coetsier > <antoine.coets...@exoscale.ch> wrote: >> Hello Daan, >> >> Our work is public and published here: >> https://github.com/exoscale/cloudstack >> >> I do not think this is worthwhile, but this is out of my league. I am >> Ccing Loic here, he will answer better than I can. >> >> Regards. >> >> Le 13.02.15 12:57, « Daan Hoogland » <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>> Antoine, >>> Did you feed your patches back to the 4.4 branch and should we release >>> another 4.4 in your opinion? >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Antoine Coetsier >>> <antoine.coets...@exoscale.ch> wrote: >>>> Hello Daan and users, >>>> >>>> We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our >>>> patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version. >>>> Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper >>>> rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in >>>> smaller versions being shipped in higher ones. >>>> >>>> Antoine >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 11.02.15 18:53, « Daan Hoogland » <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> H, >>>>> >>>>> Today we had a talk at work (Schuberg Philis) about our CloudStack >>>>> strategy. We decided that we will keep at 4.4 until we have a good >>>>> test environment of our own and then skip to 4.6 or up, depending on >>>>> where we merge our redundant vpc work in. We don't have any time to >>>>> put energy in 4.5 and need some features that won't make it there. The >>>>> afore mentioned redundant vpcs, but also ipv6 for vpcs and ovm >>>>> support. >>>>> >>>>> What I am wondering now is: >>>>> Who else is on 4.4 in production systems? >>>>> What versions do you run? >>>>> How did you test it before going to production? >>>>> What are your migration plans? >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> -- >>>>> Daan >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Daan >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
