Dan and all developers that may have been involved to help get my system upgraded I thank you for your hard work. After the sql query the upgrade went smooth and the management servers restarted with no problems.
But now I am facing another issue that I see this in my logs and my ssvm,console and vr are not starting. So I will send it to the users list and see if I can get help there. 2014-11-20 08:53:08,061 DEBUG [c.c.h.Status] (AgentTaskPool-13:ctx-c71f3f5f) Transition:[Resource state = Enabled, Agent event = Ping, Host id = 1, name = xenhv2-c1.pvdc.chlt.charlottecolo.com] 2014-11-20 08:53:12,775 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgentCronJob-41:ctx-3a06670d) Unable to get current status on 4(xenhv1-c1.pvdc.chlt.CharlotteColo.com) 2014-11-20 08:53:21,899 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] (StatsCollector-3:ctx-6a0822d4) AutoScaling Monitor is running... 2014-11-20 08:53:36,639 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-1e8ef79c) Found 0 routers to update status. 2014-11-20 08:53:36,644 DEBUG [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-1e8ef79c) Found 0 networks to update RvR status. 2014-11-20 08:53:41,716 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager Timer:ctx-c3ebd1f5) Resetting hosts suitable for reconnect 2014-11-20 08:53:41,722 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager Timer:ctx-c3ebd1f5) Completed resetting hosts suitable for reconnect 2014-11-20 08:53:41,722 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager Timer:ctx-c3ebd1f5) Acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this management server 2014-11-20 08:53:41,725 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager Timer:ctx-c3ebd1f5) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this management server 2014-11-20 08:53:41,725 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager Timer:ctx-c3ebd1f5) Acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any management server 2014-11-20 08:53:41,726 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager Timer:ctx-c3ebd1f5) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any management server 2014-11-20 08:53:43,932 WARN [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgentCronJob-82:ctx-099e7fea) Unable to get current status on 1(xenhv2-c1.pvdc.chlt.charlottecolo.com) CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me immediately by reply email so that I may correct my internal records. Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Midgett [mailto:clouds...@trick-solutions.com.INVALID] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:42 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to 4.4.1 I can't remember as this has been running for a year now. I do remember that I messed the 4.3 to 4.4 upgrade and then I did a fresh install with new db and all. At this point everything I was using worked just fine. I then read the 4.4.1 release of root disk resize and mistakenly thought that xen was included. So I started the upgrade and it all fell app art from there. Thanks Dan and everyone else for your hard work. Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:11/20/2014 4:29 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to 4.4.1 </div><div> </div>I did some more investigation In your sql dumps I found that the field was present in your 'editted' version but not in either the 4.4.0 or the 4.4.1 versions. Did you get this version of the db working? In the code I found that this statement should be executed in the 430to440 upgrade step which should have been executed during the 4.4.0 installation (the install does a 4.0.0 install and then upgrades up to the version you are installing) That would mean that during the initial install something went wrong. Did you see anything like this? thanks, On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I looked up the field that other people reported on the mailing list. > > ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL DEFAULT > '1' > > Can you try this in your upgraded system and restart? > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Matthew Midgett > <clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid> wrote: >> 4.4.2-Snapshot fails at the same >> Starting >> com.cloud.bridge.service.controller.s3.ServiceProvider_EnhancerByClou >> dStack_8d3a94eb >> >> CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may contain >> information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected >> from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any >> dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including any >> attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me >> immediately by reply email so that I may correct my internal records. >> Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its >> entirety. Thank you. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:20 AM >> To: dev >> Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to >> 4.4.1 >> >> No, this would be for testing only! >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Matthew Midgett >> <clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid> wrote: >>> How do I go about doing this with centos 6.5 management servers and will >>> there be a upgrade migration path back to 4.4.2 release? >>> >>> >>> Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III >>> >>> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Daan >>> Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:11/19/2014 4:54 >>> AM >>> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> </div><div>Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from >>> 4.4 to 4.4.1 </div><div> </div>Can you try upgrading to 4.4.2-SNAPSHOT >>> (meaning the latest state of the 4.4 branch)? to see if there is a >>> difference there. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> please sand them to daan hoogland on gmail if it needs to be >>>> private >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Matthew Midgett >>>> <clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>> It’s a few lines and Dan If you would like to view them I can send them >>>>> to you. The problem lies in the network part. >>>>> >>>>> CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may >>>>> contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise >>>>> protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). >>>>> Any dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents >>>>> (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended >>>>> recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message >>>>> in error, please notify me immediately by reply email so that I may >>>>> correct my internal records. Please then delete the original message >>>>> (including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:20 AM >>>>> To: dev >>>>> Subject: Re: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 >>>>> to >>>>> 4.4.1 >>>>> >>>>> Matthew, How big is the diff? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Matthew Midgett >>>>> <clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Thanks Nux I realized that after I posted but had to leave the office. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I side note I did the upgrade again yesterday and it failed at >>>>>> starting the bridge networking. I dropped the DB and set it up like a >>>>>> fresh install and that worked. I uploaded the upgraded db and it still >>>>>> failed to start so I decided to diff them. I then ran win merge and >>>>>> merged a lot of lines and it started again. My network was not showing >>>>>> correctly and that made since, since it would fail at the part. I spent >>>>>> most of the day yesterday mucking around the db before I said screw it >>>>>> and rolled the upgrade back. I am 100% sure that the problem is in the >>>>>> db upgrade. What I really need it is to give someone my pre update db >>>>>> and my post update db and let them run compare the two. I am sure that >>>>>> a developer can help me. There was another user that was posting on my >>>>>> original email on the user list and his management server was failing at >>>>>> the same spot so it might not be related to just me. >>>>>> >>>>>> My Db's of course contain sensitive information and I don't want to just >>>>>> add a link for everyone to see. What is the best practice for this? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic mail, including any attachment(s) may >>>>>> contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise >>>>>> protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended >>>>>> recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic email or its >>>>>> contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended >>>>>> recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message >>>>>> in error, please notify me immediately by reply email so that I may >>>>>> correct my internal records. Please then delete the original message >>>>>> (including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Matthew Midgett >>>>>> [mailto:clouds...@trick-solutions.com.INVALID] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 6:49 AM >>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: Advised to send to Dev list - Broken update from 4.4 to >>>>>> 4.4.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried again to update from 4.4.0 to 4.4.1 with centos >>>>>> management server and xenserver 6.2. Here is the logs from the >>>>>> management server and the catalina.out >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/mS0wjug7 >>>>>> >>>>>> http://pastebin.com/gwVCitvb >>>>>> >>>>>> I did fresh install with a single vm witg the db and management server >>>>>> on the same host just installed just fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> What should I do next ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daan >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >> >> >> >> -- >> Daan >> > > > > -- > Daan -- Daan
