Personally, I'd propose the defaults should be values proportional or equal to the cores number (that's how openstack does it).
Anyway, all this doesn't matter as long as no developer is listening. :-) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Logan Barfield" <lbarfi...@tqhosting.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Monday, 10 November, 2014 17:49:15 > Subject: Re: UI: "CPU (in MHz)" doesn't make sense > That was definitely only an assumption. If each host handles it different > it may be preferable to hard code a "Default" level for each hypervisor > type, as well as a few different levels (e.g., 'Max', 'High', 'Default', > 'Low', 'Min' & 'Custom'). This would operators & end-users clear options > to work with, while retaining the flexibility of a custom option. > > > Thank You, > > Logan Barfield > Tranquil Hosting > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> I am not entirely sure if 1 vs 2 = 1 vs 1000. It might be that the one >> with 1000 will get 1000 more prio to CPU compared to the one with 1. This >> needs to be clarified per each hypervisor. >> >> Lucian >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Logan Barfield" <lbarfi...@tqhosting.com> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Sent: Monday, 10 November, 2014 16:23:41 >> > Subject: Re: UI: "CPU (in MHz)" doesn't make sense >> >> > I agree completely. We've set all of our service offerings to equal >> > weights, and hard coded the same weight into the custom offering form. >> > It's a bit too confusing otherwise. >> > >> > The way I understand the weights for (Xen/KVM at least) is that they're >> > just relative, so 1 vs 2 is the same as 1 vs 1000. That being the case >> I'd >> > suggest a solution that has worked for us in the past: set the weight >> equal >> > to the memory amount (in MB). >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > >> > Thank You, >> > >> > Logan Barfield >> > Tranquil Hosting >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Basically I'm annoyed with the "CPU (in MHz)" usage in service offerings >> >> as they are a lie basically. >> >> Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7874 and >> suggest >> >> to have calculated automatically based on CPU cores number or at least >> >> having it renamed to something like "cpu weight". >> >> MHz means nothing. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> >> >> Nux! >> >> www.nux.ro
