Hi, On 16-Oct-2014, at 3:32 pm, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > Proposal: > ---- > All commits come through github PR, *even* for committers. We declare a > moratorium period (agreed suspension of activity) during which direct commit > to master is forbidden. > Only the master RM is allowed to merge PR in master (we define a master RM). > If direct commit to master is done, master RM reverts without warning. Same > for 4.5 and 4.4. branches. > ——
+1 We get the free TravisCI smoke checks and personally I find it more pleasant to view the diff, review on PR. > This is drastic and I am sure some folks will not like it, but here is my > justification for such a measure: > > Our commit and release processes have so far been based on the idea that > development happens on master and that a release branch is cut from master > (unstable development branch). Then a different set of community members > harden the release branch, QA and bring it to GA level. During that time > development keeps on going in master. > > This is an OK process if we have the luxury of having a QA team and can cope > with split personality of being developers and release managers. > > My point of view is that as a community we cannot afford such a split brain > organization and our experience overt the last year proves my point (delayed > release date, broken builds, features merged without warning…) > > We can avoid this by cutting a release branch from a stable one (from the > start), then as you (Daan) have mentioned several times, fix bugs in the > release branch and merge them back in the stable source of the release (be it > master). > > Feature development need to be done outside master, period. Not only for > non-committers but also for committers. And merge request need to be called. > This will help review and avoid surprises. > > New git workflow were proposed and shutdown, mostly calling for better CI to > solve quality issues. CI will not solve our quality issues alone. We need to > better police ourselves. > > To avoid long discussions, I propose this simple but drastic measure. We move > all our commits to github PR until 4.5 is out, this stands for committers and > non-committers, direct commits (especially to master) would be reverted > immediately. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
